This is an automatically generated translation, so may contain errors.
Home » For Netherlands

For Netherlands - VNL

Filter

Articles

2 Results

Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen 2022

in orange coat. in orange coat. 13/03/2022 Connecting Enschede, Danielle de Vries. Danielle de Vries… Read more

Floating to the parliamentary elections

Do a search of a right-wing voter, you're right, very right. What do you have to your voice floating in the Lower House Election? You can of course Geert Wilders and his PVV vote again. But actually you're a bit disappointed with Geert. He promises more than a decade snapped,… Read more

In de media

102 Results

Misogyny as a political weapon

Henk Otten and his Ottianen do not count the past

Nine out of ten offshoots of political parties spend an inglorious end. And we will also need political scientists pollster Maurice de Hond serious doubts whether "the hole on the right" where Henk Otten and his associates on target, bestaat. His chances of success for Democracy Forum for electoral 'empty suck', seem limited.

Baudet do not want to sit behind the PVV in parliament

The newly elected parliamentary group of Forum for Democracy (FVD), led by Thierry Baudet, refuses to accept the by the House suggested classification of the Chamber. That proposal would FVD of the two new MPs, next Baudet also lawyer Theo Hiddema, Instead turn right on the back of the box where the PVV is.

Controversial EU subsidy for Baudet

A handful of Polish Organizations, but also the Forum for Democracy Thierry Baudet, has received European subsidies in a way that was more reason for the European Parliament to order an investigation by anti-corruption agency OLAF. According to research by the NRC, Polish daily Gazeta Wyborcza and the Belgian news Apache.

Forum for Democracy removes tweets most often

A message is deleted on Twitter, does not mean it is gone forever. Politwoops, a project of the Open State Foundation, collects them and makes them searchable. Their latest data show that particular forum the last few weeks a lot of messages for Democracy removed.

Candidate Thierry Baudet screened at VNL and rejected

A prospective MP for Forum for Democracy, Arnj Ramutarasing, failed earlier to get list of VNL party when it emerged from a background investigation that relatives of his were involved in the criminal environment. He is financially vulnerable, according to the survey. This is confirmed by a variety of sources.

Baudet takes on PVV with patriotism and radical democracy

With a mix of hefty tax, patriotism and democratic radically innovative proposals is the Forum for Democracy in its election manifesto the competition with Geert Wilders’ PVV and Jan Roos’ VNL. The Forum wants direct democracy at all levels of government. All mayors are directly elected, Like the Prime Minister. Taxes and immigration go down, salaries for teachers and agents right up.

candidates VNL: local experience and financial knowledge

Politicians with a lot of experience at local parties should support party leader Jan Roos at For Netherlands. The party published this Monday the list of candidates for the parliamentary elections in March next year. Joram van Klaveren and Louis Bontes, The two former PVV MPs who founded the party and now sit in parliament, stand number 2 en 3 op de lijst.

"Former PVV MPs are not on the candidate list of For Netherlands (VNL)’

sought this week ThePostOnline contact with a candidate for the Netherlands (VNL), The new right-wing party led by Jan Roos. TPO wanted to interview the candidate for the section Coffee with the candidate. That phone call yielded an unexpected insight into the decision-making on the candidate list. This candidate put up last Saturday much time VNL: she put her network, raised funds and tried to enthuse volunteers. VNL also was happy. The candidate was given the promise that they would come on the candidate for the House. VNL MP Joram van Klaveren let her know: "It will be alright."

Laurence Stassen: "Heemels is a pathological liar’

Laurence Stassen says that the story of Michael Heemels in De Volkskrant on all sides rattling and not true.

Stassen is also a former leader of the PVV in Limburg Parliament and also former MEP. She stepped in late March 2014 the PVV after the less-Moroccans’ decision of Geert Wilders. She is currently president of the party VNL.

"Politics is still stuck in the last century’

VNL party leader Jan Roos today presented his manifesto. "The compartmentalization is really over.’

“Our 1500 leden, which are all very nice people. VVD public: not the pearl necklaces, but the hard-working middle class. Ja, decent than I – going quickly. But you should know that my role as presenter of PowNed even had a role. I take this very seriously, because of course there are big problems in the Netherlands. Which simply need to be addressed.

New Right: for whom 'less, less’ go too far

They have a white house with plastic garden. There might be a boat, a nail salon, a job in the IT sector. The electorate of the two most right-wing parties can be found among people who first tended to the PVV, but is there not feeling at home. Anthropologist Josse de Voogd outlines the map of New Right in Netherlands.

look, yet another new party

Publicist Thierry Baudet tries Hague breaking the "cartel" of mainstream political parties, He announced this week. As journalist John Rose and many others. What are their chances? In: they address the handy?

Jan Roos blows struggle for right to vote

Jan Roos is leader of For Netherlands, party PVV leavers Louis Bontes and Joram van Klaveren. Rose stops by return at GeenStijl, where he was a reporter. He was the leader of the No campaign level, which this spring was enforced the referendum on the trade agreement with Ukraine.

"My daughter may come home with everyone’

Joram van Klaveren left the PVV and now wants to stay in the room with his VNL. Coming weeks, he sits between bottles and diapers: his third daughter was born. ,,Then Hague very far away.” The Northern Mole at Scheveningen is enchanted by an orange glow in a beautiful sunset. The silhouette of a large yacht comes closer. The screen of the iPhone by MP Joram van Klaveren lights. ,,Even my wife a picture of the tongue flaps. They thought we would catch nothing!”

State Council criticized proposal Nexit referendum

Since chosen in Britain for a Brexit, Netherlands sounds the call for an even louder Nexit. The political party VNL filed in March already proposed a referendum in Nexit, but the Council of State is critical.

The Council of State, the principal adviser on legislation, finds that the petitioners have to 'reconsider' the proposal for an EU referendum. In practice, this means that the State Council VNL advises not to submit the bill.

"EU is funding Dutch referendum None level under the microscope '

There are indications that the Dutch campaign No level for the referendum on the European Association Agreement with Ukraine was financed with money from the European Parliament. The legislation, however, prohibits foundations use such subsidies to campaigns for elections or referenda. The European Parliament is now investigating whether there is abuse. Until that discovery came journalists from the Belgian platform for investigative journalism Apache.

VNL: discarded voice PVV, Geert will never reign

For Netherlands (VNL) on Saturday the attack on the PVV and VVD. At the first congress of the party of former PVV MPs Louis Bontes and Joram van Klaveren government party VVD was dismissed as ,,fopliberalisme”. ,,And a vote for the PVV is discarded vote, because PVV leader Geert Wilders wants and will never reign.”

The new party is classically liberal and therefore the alternative right, Bontes and Van Klaveren kept around 250 present for.

VNL catches the right partijgat Wilders

The first congress of the party for the Netherlands (VNL) Hague was a great sleep in the Freedom Party of Geert Wilders: Look, we have a real party.

Over two hundred members had come to Kijkduin and cheered at the presentation of a scientific agency (Adam Smith Instituut), VNL a youth organization and the announcement of an upcoming performance of "the last truly right-wing VVD, namely Frits Bolkestein '.

Bram Moszkowicz has no regrets

Bram Moszkowicz was three years ago for life suspended as a lawyer and then began a brief political career. Yet he has no regrets.

"I certainly have no regrets", states Bram Moszkowicz about his political adventure across Pure Luxury. "The party (of VNL) These were just okay. Only the people involved are not ", said the former lawyer who claims that he himself resigned. "I do not use me as a puppet."

Louis Bontes back to VNL

Louis Bontes returns to the Netherlands for party (VNL). The parliamentarian was last year do not agree with the appointment of Bram Moszkowicz as party leader and turned their backs VNL. Two weeks ago Moszkowicz was put out of the party, that clearing the way for the return of Bontes.

get ex PVV MPs 2,5 ton PVV grant within

for Netherlands (VNL), the party of former PVV MPs Joram van Klaveren and Louis Bontes, has over 250 thousand euros received subsidies which the PVV would have reached if it had been a party member. The movement Think, former PvdA members Kuzu and Öztürk, had hoped for the same amount, but most looks fade into the Labour Party.

VNL breaks with Bram Moszkowicz

For the Netherlands, Bram Moszkowicz put aside as party leader. The three VNL directors say on the site of their party that they have different expectations of the completion of the party leadership now done by Moszkowicz.

VNL breaks with Bram Moszkowicz

For the Netherlands, Bram Moszkowicz put aside as party leader. The three VNL directors say on the site of their party that they have different expectations of the completion of the party leadership now done by Moszkowicz.

"Bram wanted politicians do a bit’

unique conversation: Joram van Klaveren (36), Laurence Stassen (44) and Johan Driessen (34) For the Netherlands Party (VNL) speaking Elsevier why they are disappointed in their intended party leader Bram Moszkowicz.

Bram Moszkowicz has failed as a political leader of the Party for the Netherlands (VNL). The board is all set with him. Party chairman Laurence Stassen, Board member Johan Driessen and member of parliament Joram van Klaveren former criminal lawyer would mean giving this week that they do not want to go with him. Previously they gave Elsevier open about what went wrong. Therefore there is no way back.

Ex-attorney Moszkowicz advocates for community service

The hard disgraced former lawyer Bram Moszkowicz advocates more frequent imposition of community service. The deleted counsel believes that no one will be better prison.

Moszkowicz gave his plea in AT5 program in Amsterdam 2015.
He believes not in jail for minor offenses. ,,I have 27 years people assisted, and that sometimes were not the least but there has never been anyone better out of jail.”

VNL wants brochure: what to do in terrorist attack

More than half of the Dutch population (63 percent) do not know what to do in case of a terrorist attack, which according to a survey conducted by Maurice de Hond. Dog kept the sample on behalf of MP Joram van Klaveren (VNL) who believe that the government therefore should actively inform.

OM Rutte can not continue to asylum

The public prosecutor can not prosecute Prime Minister Mark Rutte and the State to asylum. Commissioned by the OM know Wednesday. In early November, Bram Moszkowicz, party leader for Netherlands (VNL), declaration against the government.

"Give priority seekers no longer in housing’

Delete the municipal duty to ensure the reception of asylum seekers. To this end member of parliament Joram van Klaveren advocates of the new party for the Netherlands (VNL). The former PVV'er is an eyesore that asylum seekers must remain a priority in the Netherlands regular house hunters. Friday, he shall submit a proposal to amend the law. Today the House is debating a housing shortage in the social sector.

"Moszkowicz had multiple problems'

Former lawyer Bram Moszkowicz has not appeared Monday for the second time in its case against former client Donald G.. Moszkowicz challenged 35.000 euro van G. have borrowed. A friend of Donald G. the judge told today that money to have delivered personally Moszkowicz.

Stassen new chairman VNL

Laurence Stassen is the new chairman of the political party VNL. She follows parliamentarian Bontes as party chairman, which resigned his post after the selection of former lawyer Bram Moszkowicz as party leader.

On the road with Bram Moszkowicz and a lot of ex-PVV MPs

About ten journalists and photographers have gathered at the entrance of the Almere City Hall. At the market shuffling people through the drizzle. At one o'clock Bram Moszkowicz will start here Saturday with the Tour for the Netherlands ". Where the tour will bring him exactly is still unknown, but he will at least have to make its appearance in Lelystad and Urk. According to the 'chef leaflets VNL' will I get a lot of places in.

Background: party members? Since Bram Moszkowicz wipe it off his ass

The new party 'for the Netherlands' (VNL) tomorrow gets an appealing leader and the splinter party will finally be counted in the polls. Bram Moszkowicz is hoisted on the shield. The first opponent has also been spotted: Louis Bontes not like it and does not accept reappointment. This kind of problems were to be expected. Because party democracy poses at VNL nothing.

Bontes stop VNL to Moszkowicz

Member of Parliament Louis Bontes leave the Netherlands for party (VNL). Bontes, was the president, it does not agree that former lawyer Bram Moszkowicz is appointed as leader of the party.

Wilders demonstrates in 'radical’ islamcongres

PVV leader Geert Wilders continues tomorrow with two party members demonstrate in a controversial Islamic conference in Utrecht. According to the politician get there preaching controversial radical Muslims. The municipality does not prohibit the event but ,,keeps with the police and have a finger on the pulse”.

Right from the rubble (8): Anatomy of a right-wing splinter party

It seems so easy: you split off as a politician and you announced that you start a new game. Currently there are several people in the House with this plan. The former Labour Party-ers Kuzu Öztürk and want to start their own party, former PVV MPs Bontes and Van Klaveren put a right alternative for the PVV down and former 50Plus'er Klein started the "Liberal Party".

Dissatisfied PVV MPs resort to VNL

Who does not want to: more freedom, more prosperity and more security. It is the motto of "For the Netherlands', the party which increasingly dissatisfied PVV representatives make use of it. VNL short. Quite right party, but one where the word Islam is not in the fundamentals. Well: 'Hopeless immigration does our country no good', en: "Safety should be the core of the government '.

PVV faction surprise resignation Jansen

Ton van Kesteren is surprised by the decision of Matthijs Jansen not to run for the next council elections. The President of the Groningen PVV States Group let know by SMS: 'Too Bad. Always very good cooperation. Fine colleague / friend. But as with all parties: Politicians come and go!’ Van Kesteren wants to not respond to the sudden departure of Jansen.

Right from the rubble (5): VNL forces PVV to another media policy

Most politicians are unknown, but the political parties on the right that almost all. Parties like the LPF, Proud of the Netherlands and the PVV are organized around a leader and it is therefore granted almost all the media attention. The LPF had except Matt Herbert barely known politicians, except Joost Eerdmans. Verdonk was the only face Proud of the Netherlands and many PVV MPs are hardly known.

Chronicle

175 Results
*

PVV-leider Geert Wilders participates in a major election debate of the NOS. He attacks the PvdA hard for the proposition “The Netherlands belongs to all of us“. Wilders says that Islam is the biggest threat to the Netherlands. The Denk party cancels the debate because it does not want to have a debate with Jan Roos van Voor Nederland, because Rose would be xenophobic and homophobic. Roos portrayed Regilio Tuur as Zwarte Piet and made stigmatizing comments about Muslims.

*

Into the national debate on Islam in a mosque Rotterdam. Voor Nederland-foreman Jan Roos would speak, but cancels anyway because he considers the mosque as one “haatpaleis” sees. He got information from Tanya Hoogwerf van Leefbaar Rotterdam who is also a candidate on behalf of Voor Nederland is. She argues that it is a place where imams scream that homosexuality is a disease and where they would cooperate with the Muslim Brotherhood. There would be enormous hatred for the Jews. Jan Roos therefore concludes that the guide is fake and does not want to come again. Geert Wilders of the PVV also refuses to come and says: “no way. Unless I can close that mega-mosque permanently“. It does have party leader Hero Brinkman of the Ondernemerspartij signed up at the last minute. In the audience will be PVV-voters are present.

*

On an internet profile of Nijmegen Rechtsaf photos of flyers and posters of Identitair Verzet with the text “Liars, Euro traps! Raiders!“. One is posted under a place name sign Nijmegen. Two flyers are held in front of the photo next to place name signs Wijchen and Beuningen. explains the action group: “Today activists went from Nijmegen Rechtsaf get started in Wijchen and Beuningen. Received many positive reactions and had good conversations along the way“. Nijmegen Rechtsaf gives a voting advice: PVV, Forum voor Democratie, Voor Nederland.

*

Demonstration of the NVU in Den Haag under the slogan: “Voting advice 2017, what are you going to vote for 15 maart?”. The 40 participants are advised to vote for the PVV, Forum voor Democratie, SGP of Voor Nederland. Party leader Constant Kusters brought a series of speakers like Peter van Egmond, Wesley Hendrickx, Morten Lorentzen en Yvette Evers. The order service is in the hands of this day Michel Boerboom en René Rütze. There are delegations of the Autonome Nationalisten Vlaanderen en United We Stand Holland – Protecting Our Citizens (UWSH).

*

Voor Nederland drafts parliamentary questions about a planned campaign meeting 11 maart in Rotterdam. It concerns the arrival of the Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs, as part of the campaign for a referendum. Voor Nederland refers to a ‘Turkish meddling campaign in the Netherlands'. Ook Geert Wilders of the PVV is against the arrival of the minister.

*

An election debate in Rotterdam waar Tanya Hoogwerf to participate as a candidate of Voor Nederland. She is also a city councilor Leefbaar Rotterdam. In the debate, she says that the police must be allowed to keep people with a tan without cause. She advocates for impunity for ethnic profiling and says this is a view of it Voor Nederland is.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions presents on “upcoming Hamas conference Rotterdam” op 15 april. However, it is a Palestinian conference. The party asks whether organizations related to terrorist groups such as Hamas should be banned. In a later reply, the minister said there is no hard information about Hamas involvement.

*

The Party Voor Nederland submits a motion in parliament requesting the government “Immediately detain asylum seekers after their arrival until the AIVD and the police have carried out a careful screening“. Voor Nederland states that a lot goes wrong with the screening of asylum seekers and that there is a chance that terrorists will successfully hide in the asylum flow.

*

The Party Voor Nederland asks parliamentary questions about “a terror imam Eindhoven”. It concerns a Kuwaiti sheik who has just been placed on an American terror list. Voor Nederland asks if the sheik calls for support for jihad in Syria. He would be in 2016 have spoken in an Eindhoven mosque. The party asks why the Minister does not close mosques that invite violent preachers and why he does not let their foundations dissolve.

*

In Question Time in the House of Representatives calls Machiel de Graaf of the PVV to enter a mosque Utrecht to close: “This hate hut has to be closed, because it is a divisive mushroom for Dutch society. Set an example and close this mosque“, zegt hij. In recent days, parties in the House have been outraged by the practices of a Salafist organization in this mosque. Students would be told not to report criminal Muslims to the police. Geert Wilders already responded via the internet “Shocking. Close that mosque“. Voor Nederland asks parliamentary questions about it.

*

A debate is being held in the House of Representatives on a bill by Voor Nederland. It is about removing the anti-discrimination articles from criminal law. Voor Nederland wants to broaden freedom of expression. In this debate comes the VVD in conflict with the opposition. De VVD believes that there is talk of adjusting or deleting the article on group insulting law. The CDA strongly argues against this and does not want to make Holocaust denial easier. The CDA wants to avoid going to the synagogue with a swastika flag or a neo-Nazi uniform. A large majority should not like the proposal. On behalf of the PVV late Martin Bosma know that his party is in favor of the proposal. The proposal will be discussed further later.

*

Take it to court Schiphol (in Badhoevedorp) delivers judgment in the criminal case against Geert Wilders in the ‘less Moroccans‘ matter. The judges determine that the judgments of the PVV-foreman are punishable, but do not impose punishment. The sentence alone is enough punishment for the politician. Wilders incited discrimination, because he turned on a clear group of people, from the same region. From a legal point of view, there is then race. Wilders is acquitted of inciting hatred. The statements are a form of conscious group insult. The entire Moroccan population group in the Netherlands was dismissed as inferior. Wilders is not present at the verdict and he will appeal against the verdict. The political party Voor Nederland calls it a "black day for freedom of expression“. Outside, two protesters are present with a protest sign on which “In …. do you want more or less political processes?” staat. The Public Prosecution Service also appeals.

*

A motion was tabled in the House of Representatives by Voor Nederland asking the government to dissolve Islamic foundations that invite preachers of violence. The party argues that radical Islam is at odds with Western core values ​​and that it proclaims a message that prevents integration into our society.

*

The Party Voor Nederland submits three motions to the House of Representatives. The party wants to deprive citizens of dual nationality from Dutch citizenship after being convicted of a serious crime, because she "are significantly overrepresented in crime statistics”. Then will Voor Nederland a "thorough reform of the European Court- and Human Rights Convention” because they are the Netherlands “has wrongfully charged with racism and human rights abuses under Dutch anti-terror law“. according to Voor Nederland the Court does: “otherworldly and activist justice” with which she “has frustrated the effective fight against terrorism by sovereign and democratic states for years“. Finally, the party wants the subsidy from the Reporting Center for Internet Discrimination (MiND) because this hotline believes that discrimination and inciting violence against gay people should be possible, as long as it happens on the basis of Islam or another philosophy of life. The reporting center says it was an incorrect assessment.

*

Voor Nederland asks parliamentary questions about a media report “Amsterdam synagogue target of Dutch jihadists“. The party has concerns about Jewish institutions that have been explicitly targeted by Islamic terrorists, while the municipality Amsterdam has removed police posts at these locations. Voor Nederland wants the posts not to be replaced by camera surveillance.

*

A debate in the House of Representatives on the so-called burqa ban, where the PVV has been asking for for a long time. A group of women who all wear a nikab appears and this causes commotion. First they are refused at the entrance, later they can go in for the debate and sit in the public gallery. Several MPs criticize this. Voor Nederland says it is not a sight that there are women in nikab in the public gallery. The women say they feel oppressed by the men who say they shouldn't wear nikab. In the vote, a large majority agreed to introduce the burqa ban. Burqas, nikab's, balaclavas and full-face helmets are prohibited in education, public transport, hospitals and in government buildings. You can wear it on the street. Beware of the Senate 26 juni 2018 also agrees to the law, the new rules per 1 augustus 2019 into force.

*

In Emmen is a Bosnian Serb, the already 18 years in Emmen lives, at the hairdresser. There the hairdresser discusses the collision with another customer 16 november between Voor Nederland and Think in the House. The discussion at the hairdresser is quite racist and they think Think a cunt. They bring in Zwarte Piet, also Sylvana Simons and “negroes” would then “die kutapen" to be. The Bosnian Serb demands a little more respect, but gets the response that he can rot better. He does that too, he leaves. Later he returns to film the hairdresser. He doesn't like that and sends him away. Another customer comes to recover with some physical violence. He also says that he “a goat has to fuck”.

*

Louis Bontes the party Voor Nederland questions the loyalty of a Turkish-Dutch parliamentarian from Denk in the House of Representatives: “You are here to plead for the abolition of the Dutch army. Erdogan should do the same? Where does your loyalty lie, I wonder that“. The Think MP feels offended and says: “Who are you to ask me the loyalty question? Who are you?“. Bontes responds: “Who are you then dude?” en “If I loved my country so much, I would live there. Go to Turkey!“. The President of the Chamber tries in vain to intervene.

*

There are parliamentary questions Voor Nederland asked about “discrimination against native Dutch by a councilor from The Hague“. It is about an alderman in Den Haag who, with equal suitability, wants to give priority to immigrants in applications in order to compensate for their backlog. Voor Nederland however states that “the only form of institutional racism in the Netherlands “positive” discrimination“. They want the Minister to hold the councilor responsible for this.

*

Voor Nederland in the House of Representatives submits a motion asking the government to work towards ending subsidization of special religious education because of the secularization of society. Voor Nederland wants this because the current system offers room for the emergence of “a new Islamic pillar”.

*

A motion of the party Voor Nederland about Islamic terrorists who died in November 2015 probably traveled to the Netherlands without hindrance. Writes the party: “Whereas it has been shown several times that terrorists abuse the influx of asylum to carry out attacks in Europe“, requests Voor Nederland the government "to limit our limits”.

*

Written parliamentary questions by MPs from Voor Nederland about teaching packages about Zwarte Piet in Maassluis. The party calls it “politically correct choice” to explain Zwarte Piet from the slavery past. Voor Nederland believes to see a racist element in a teaching package, because people are asked if they play Zwarte Piet, really want to tease black people. The party asks whether the Minister shares the vision “Dutch traditions and folklore should never be given up for multiculturalism“. Voor Nederland wants the Minister to be the mayor of Maassluis speaks to it “senseless intention to distribute the teaching packages among primary schools“.

*

A motion in the House of Representatives of Voor Nederland calling on the government to stop allowing Turkish imams broadcast by the Turkish government agency Diyanet and to end Turkish funding for Diyanet mosques in the Netherlands. The party argues that these imams have ensured that the integration of Turks in the Netherlands “completely failed”. Voor Nederland wants Turkish state interference in the Netherlands "should finally be stopped”. In a second motion notes Voor Nederland that the cabinet has invested a lot of tax money in the design of Islam- and imam courses in the Netherlands and it is said that this should not be a task of the government. For the Netherlands, this funding requests to stop.

*

There are parliamentary questions asked by Voor Nederland over “support for terror Rotterdam Salafist school“. They ask if it is true that an organization in Qatar, on a list of state terror, purchased the school (An answer later this turns out to be wrong). The party wants to terminate two Dutch foundations. They want that there are no Salafist schools in Netherlands.

*

The Party Voor Nederland send an “accompanying letter” the chairman of the House in which it sends a bill “concerning the stopping of positive discrimination“.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland about death threats against Lower Turks by Erdogan supporters. They ask what does the minister of "bizarre pro-Erdogan demonstrations"Europe and Rotterdam. They want to stop the interference of Erdogan in the Netherlands and protect the safety of its critics. They want to end the Turkish financing by Diyanet mosques in Netherlands. The party sees the demonstration in Rotterdam as evidence of failed integration and a threat to public order and safety.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions allows the refusal of the government to a list of mosques publish would receive money from Saudi Arabia.

*

The fraction of Voor Nederland in Parliament questions the “intimidation and death threats to the address of a gay couple in Amsterdam” (zie 3 juli 2016). The party wants the minister recognizes that non-western immigrants Amsterdam relatively speaking are often accused of homophobic violence. Voor Nederland asks the minister sees a relationship with the Islamic background of the neighbors. The party also wants not victims, perpetrators but their city or neighborhood should leave. They ask whether the Minister "concerns over 70% of the population stated that the society becomes structurally disrupted as a result of the mismanagement in the field of immigration and integration”.

*

A newspaper report about a gay couple in Amsterdam which is threatened by neighbors with death. The harassment of neighbors, according to the couple began about six weeks ago. It is Moroccan-Dutch neighbors who would not accept that two men live next to them. They did nasty statements and sharp objects thrown into their yard. There are stones thrown against the windows, and they are kept awake late into the night. The couple wants to move away from Amsterdam. The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland enables it to 5 juli Parliamentary questions about. The neighbors say that there is mutual nuisance and they defend themselves by saying that the gay couple "Moroccans Hate” would have. Moreover, the accusation of gay hatred would be invented. The gay couple would have threatened once when a neighbor arguing with a baseball bat and ‘dirty Moroccans‘ have called. After this dive the Moroccan-Dutch families under threat due.

*

Voor Nederland serves in parliament a motion on “Moroccan street terror Almere, Gouda, Ede en Amsterdam“. The party aims at “the establishment of car fires and terrorizing public transport“. Voor Nederland wants the national police acting much more firmly against it and calls on the government to combat pollution by a national priority Moroccan-Dutch youths to give.

*

The MPs Louis Bontes en Joram van Klaveren van Voor Nederland visit a neighborhood in Amsterdam-North. They share out flyers of their party. The duo wants residents stabbing a shot in the arm because of the inconvenience of an aggressive youth gang in the neighborhood. The young people commit burglaries, robberies and throwing stones. Had to move at least one of the residents after the youth ‘Cunt Moroccans‘ had named.

*

A family in Almere hangs briefly, so about ten minutes, Israeli flag to celebrate the son's success. It is quickly responded with insults and raised middle fingers of passing motorists. they call: “filthy Jews, we are going to tackle” en “kankerzionisten, rotzionisten”. According to the father of the family are “fellow countrymen“. It is also reported that the party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about the anti-Semitic threats will pose.

*

In the evening there is an information of the municipality Hellevoetsluis about building an asylum center. The church invites twenty residents today also personally. The mayor goes to people visiting or throws a letter into their sleeve if they are not at home. Between the invitation and the meeting is hardly time and people will feel overwhelmed. In addition, residents fear any impairment of their home, more burglaries and the absence of tourists. The Member of Parliament Louis Bontes van Voor Nederland from Hellevoetsluis supports the applicants and calls for a referendum.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland the visit of a “antisemitic violence imam” from Pakistan. They call the imam in a question “virulent anti-Semite“, which states that all problems on Earth are caused by the Jews and that the Jews should be exterminated. Voor Nederland asks where he will preach in the Netherlands and why he will not be denied access to the country. The party also wants the organization which is dissolved invited him. The Minister knows nothing of a lecture in Netherlands.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland over “a subsidized hate feast“. It is a Ramadan festival by the municipality Den Haag sponsored. The party finds it inappropriate that the municipality subsidizes a party where men and women have separate sitting and where "guest speakers terrorists glorified”. Voor Nederland wants the Minister to withdraw government support for the project and the municipality Den Haag briefly at the municipal. A later response from the minister, that there is given no subsidy.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland about giving store credit for asylum seekers Oisterwijk. The money they get to buy furniture for their home. Voor Nederland This will go beyond all bounds because other municipalities give less money. The party wants a national guideline with the lowest cost will be paramount and there is always a construction loan. Voor Nederland says that such excesses will undermine public support even further and that more than is sensible to work towards to the Australian model, where asylum seekers only be caught in their own region.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland a ban on “Anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement“, that the party responds to a media article “Anti Zionist patrols shop noses at A.H“. Voor Nederland asks the Minister shares the concerns about “the intimidating shop patrols"A Palestinian solidarity organization. The party asks why this organization has ANBI status. Voor Nederland asks whether there is a link with the anti-Semitic terrorist organization Hamas, and they want the government funded public or facilitated prohibits institutions to boycott Israeli products.

*

A motion Voor Nederland in parliament in which the party argues that the growing influence of Salafism in Dutch mosques. Voor Nederland notes that there is a relationship with jihadism and see that violence Salafist preachers are invited by Dutch mosques. The party sees this as a threat to public order and against the power of integration. Voor Nederland calls on the government to mosques, Inviting preachers of violence, to close.

*

The Party Voor Nederland allows the parliament parliamentary questions about the coming of a "jihad preacher"To a mosque in Den Haag. They ask how it is possible that the relevant imam, "which teaches violent jihad and is associated with the recruitment of Foreign rebel fighters in the Syrian Civil War“, could speak in Netherlands. Voor Nederland aims to further the organization is dissolved and invited him on the mosque is closed. A later response from the Minister appears there does not appear after listening to preach the existence of an extremist preacher.

*

In Parliament, the party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about requesting the help of the Moroccan consul in case of disturbances Ede. The party sees it as undermining the authority of the Dutch authorities and wants "very firm"Action to restore peace and order. A later reply that the help of the consul is not invoked. The consul himself has requested a meeting with the mayor and only supports the Moroccan-Dutch community Ede in rejecting the misconduct of the youth.

*

Parliamentary questions by the party Voor Nederland over “Moroccan riots set in Ede“. The party asks why Moroccan youth so extreme over-represented in crime. Voor Nederland thinks she 'would benefit from a few months military discipline so much needed ways to get it yet.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland over “the visit of a terror preacher at a mosque in Boskoop“. It is a controversial Islamic preacher with international connections. Voor Nederland wants the minister to the minister persona non grata be explained and so also with other foreign ministers violence, because of the danger to public order. The party asks why there has never entered a mosque for facilitating violence preachers. She wants to dissolve organizations and deprive them of any ANBI status. Voor Nederland that the minister wants the mayor Boskoop Calls to close the mosque violence.

*

In calling a parliamentary debate Joram van Klaveren van Voor Nederland the minister to make an end to "halalzwemmen”. These are separate bathing projects for men and women Rotterdam en Breda. Voor Nederland finds it outrageous and calls it “sekseapartheid“. Van Klaveren must submit a motion. In a second motion he wants the government to withdraw the residence permits “newcomers who culpably not integrate“, such as learning the Dutch language.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland about the “yield of a school for gay hate“. This is a school in Coevorden (zie 15 april). The party sees a parallel with refugee centers where endangered gay are transferred, "address instead of the perpetrators”.

*

Parliamentary questions from the party Voor Nederland over “The major objections to the arrival of hundreds of extra asylum seekers to Maastricht“. It is about the demonstration against AZC of 16 april and social unrest. The party wants a municipality always advance should organize a referendum on the introduction of an AZC or additional refugees. The MPs Voor Nederland see only reception in the region as a structural solution to this problem.

*

Louis Bontes, the Member of Parliament from Voor Nederland is, wants in his hometown Hellevoetsluis organize a referendum. He wants to decide the residents themselves whether or not to a refugee center in the town. So far only the interest Residents Party Hellevoetsluis the referendum plan. Bontes says he wants to prevent backroom. This evening the city council decided that the college should investigate whether there should be a referendum. In late March, the College that they would rather choose other forms of participation and awareness, also because of the high cost of a referendum and the protection of the vulnerable group of refugees.

*

In the House must Voor Nederland a motion which asks the government to police any more house calls to perform at citizens who have criticized the arrival of asylum seekers. Voor Nederland states that these visits can be as intimidating and that freedom of expression should not be affected.

In a second motion calls on the government party to the cooperation between the police Den Haag and a Salafist mosque for maintaining order during the New Year to end. Voor Nederland is to the increasing influence of the Salafist ideas counteract. The second motion is subsequently adopted by the House.

*

At a congress of the party Voor Nederland in Den Haag is the youth section (Jong VNL) presented. There are 250 people present.

*

A motion Voor Nederland where the party asks the government to first hold a referendum in a municipality before a set AZC. Voor Nederland says that she wants to actively involve citizens in decision-making on an AZC. There would prevent distress.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents an assault on an elderly Jewish couple in Amsterdam op 4 augustus 2015 where much violence is used. The old man is hereby beaten blind. According to the party, the perpetrators would have looked Moroccan or Arabic. The robbers were: “here the jewels dirty Jewess, you had Auschwitz must be” have called.

Geert Wilders of the PVV writes about the Internet: “Moroccans Violence victim“. With his second Martin Bosma he goes to visit the couple.

*

In the House must Voor Nederland a motion in which the party argues that the influx of asylum seekers remains unprecedented. Voor Nederland wants the government to pronounce what the maximum number of applicants that can handle Netherlands. The party believes that the Dutch absorption capacity is not infinite.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions allows the cancellation of a meeting Almere Outside with a “Islamic preacher violence“. The party wants to ban violent preachers at any time from Netherlands. In this case the PVV-faction in the City Council Almere have reported that the mayor allows a preacher “has called the Jews descendants of apes and pigs“.

*

In proposes parliament Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about the banning of journalists at information evenings about asylum seekers. The questions include a briefing about in AZC Luttelgeest at this date. As a kind of emergency ordinance has been promulgated and journalists are not allowed to enter the area. This curtailment of press freedom leads to uproar. The meeting is intended for residents and voice their concerns. Later known that the AZC not going to come.

*

The two parliamentarians Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about alleged “cover-up "after assaults by asylum seekers Almere. Later it appears to one case of sexual assault. The party asked whether there is deliberately kept information about incidents involving asylum seekers back.

In a second round of questions they want Islamic “violence preacher” Haitham al-Haddad from Britain, die in Utrecht wants to talk, deny access to Netherlands and foundations that invite prohibit him. Voor Nederland asks whether a database of violence preachers. Through all the noise in the hall says Utrecht off the rental. The minister departs later to Almere.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland about the subject “Police visit to twitter criticizing AZC”. They go into the house call in the police Sliedrecht brought someone calling to come to a council meeting on 19 January and there to protest against AZC. Voor Nederland The police visit looks like “very intimidating” and states that the freedom of expression it is under pressure. They want the police with it immediately stops.

*

Parliamentary questions from the parliamentary group of Voor Nederland on the request from France for a jihadi ISIS movie to remove the Dutch website ThePostOnline. Voor Nederland sees it as censorship. The minister later explained that it is an anti-jihad measure.

*

MPs from Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about harassment of a Jewish family in Amsterdam during the New years eve. They ask if there is a relationship "between the rapidly growing antisemitism and massive immigration from non-Western countries". Voor Nederland suggests that one in five history teachers can hardly discuss the Holocaust due to reactions of Muslim students.

*

In parliament should Voor Nederland a motion the arrival of half a million new seekers. The party wants the Netherlands to close the borders and does not agree with the European Parliament, that is to resettle new asylum seekers.

*

Parliamentary questions from MPs of Voor Nederland an applicant who is suspected of terrorism. They ask whether other applicants into view as terrorism suspects and whether the government recognizes the danger that terrorists are hiding among the asylum flows.

*

Voor Nederland is a motion in which the party says that Islamic extremism must be fought. To this end it invites the government to force ministers at all times to refuse entry to our country.

*

The Party Voor Nederland serves in parliament a motion in which it states that everything suggests that jihadists enter through the current asylum Europe. The party says that Dutch jihadists roam freely in our country. Voor Nederland wants to prevent new terrorist attacks. This is why the government is requested to make ASAP administrative detention possible, so that jihadists can be picked up more easily the basis of the measure and fixed put.

*

Parliamentary questions by the parliamentary group of Voor Nederland about the "Syrian suicide bomber who came from Greece to Europe. It is about a man who in Parijs blew up. They ask whether more terrorists entered through the migration Europe. They want the minister will in turn stop the recording of asylum seekers.

*

In the House must Voor Nederland an amended motion. The party calls a trainee in which Almere a class Muslim warriors ISIS called a "Jewish conspiracy". Voor Nederland states that this hampers the fight against anti-Semitism and wants the government anti-Semitism in education counteracts. The party argues that some of the history teachers in the Randstad hardly dares to discuss the Holocaust.

*

Bram Moszkowicz en Joram van Klaveren the party Voor Nederland declare to the Cabinet Rutte. They argue that the government asylum policy violates two articles of the Criminal Code. According to their reasoning, the Netherlands occupies Syrian asylum seekers and sit possible I.S.. Jihadists between. Thus, the government will jeopardize Netherlands. Also Netherlands would thus assist an enemy in time of war. The declaration seems mainly intended as an election stunt. The Prosecution leave soon know they can not sue the government for asylum, because their immunity.

*

A large and noisy demonstration AZC Alert Enschede against the arrival of a refugee center in this city. Here are radical groups such as the present action group DTG and the neo-Nazis of the Kameraadschap Noord-Nederland in the NVU. Identitair Verzet issued a call to come here. Staten Edgar Mulder of the PVV and Member of Parliament Louis Bontes van Voor Nederland its speakers. There are riots and journalists threatened. Police arrested six people, among other things for the placing of the Nazi salute, but also for the assaults and threats. There are about 400 people present. In the disturbances are football supporters of Twente present.

*

A motion Voor Nederland in parliament where the government is asked to pay for any language lessons for asylum seekers who have not yet “asylum permit” hebben. In a second motion, the party that anti-Semitic teaching materials in use in education and some of the history teachers barely dare to discuss the Holocaust. Voor Nederland says that in Almere a trainee was in the class ISIS called a Jewish conspiracy. The party calls on the Government to make every effort to combat anti-Semitism in education.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions enables the reception of asylum seekers Den Bosch. The party believes the combination of refugees from war zones and psychiatric patients, which are also cared for on site, “quite absurd”. They want the government to the mayor Den Bosch This plan dissuades.

*

Parliamentary questions from the MPs of Voor Nederland the expected long-term cost of the influx of asylum seekers. They want to know how many refugees in the Netherlands now receive child support and how much costs involved. They ask what percentage of the Syrian and Iraqi asylum seekers are expected to will continue in Netherlands. Voor Nederland wants an estimate of their long-term stay, in assistance, health insurance, public housing, education and fighting crime.

*

In states parliament Voor Nederland Filed questions on sparing upscale neighborhoods in the reception of seekers. They fear that care in poor neighborhoods people will lead to resistance and problems, as recently in Rotterdam. Voor Nederland want the government, as long as they do not bet on single reception in the region, advises municipalities to realize the reception in those areas where electoral support for the reception policy and then to protect the people's neighborhoods. The party wants the government formulates a maximum seekers that our country can. Voor Nederland qualifies the asylum issue as "mop with the tap". In addition, they want the government within the EU takes the initiative to break the Schengen Agreement in order again to allow structural border controls.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions suggests about swearing by Allah at a military swearing in front of the town of Soest. The party believes this is misguided. She wants soldiers, Civil servants and police officers should not have the opportunity to take an Islamic oath.

*

The mayor of Amstelveen speaking at an information meeting with Jewish organizations worried about the emergency of refugees in the Jewish Quarter Amstelveen. One is afraid of incidents involving refugees from Syria and Iraq. Which would negatively affect the reputation of the refugees themselves. The next day, the party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions in parliament about this shelter in Amstelveen. The party argues that virulent anti-Semitism in Syria and Iraq, and that the arrival of tens of thousands of immigrants from predominantly Muslim societies, increases the risk of a growth of anti-Semitism. Voor Nederland wants the government to counteract this threat and the government calls a maximum number of persons who can absorb Netherlands.

*

The Party Voor Nederland represents in parliament several parliamentary questions. So the MPs found that too many asylum seekers in the village Oranje in Drenthe are going to be taken care. They argue that there are concerns among the Dutch population about the mass arrival of asylum seekers to the country and therefore want to close the borders to new applicants. Voor Nederland wants to organize only reception in the region. The party advocates a discouragement and deleting priority schemes. They also comment on the appointment of an envoy migration, because of his background in the Green and Novib. They call it a "wretched decision" because these organizations the large influx of asylum seekers do not want dams. Finally complains Voor Nederland at the absence of Prime Minister Rutte, “while unfolding a complete drama asylum in Netherlands”. They want to hear a maximum number of applicants to the Netherlands, according to Rutte.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland about visits by police officers in members AZC-Alert in Enschede. The party believes that the police send a wrong signal to proceed unsolicited home visits to people with unwelcome opinion about AZCs. They find that the police should focus on crime and stop the visits.

*

Parliamentary questions from the MPs of Voor Nederland the arrival of "more than half a million illegal immigrants to Europe". They want the government to prevent the arrival of hundreds of thousands of immigrants to Europe and Netherlands. They just want “reception in the region” as a solution.

*

MPs from Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions ask about "the advent of a new Islamic preacher violence to Netherlands. Which would in 7 October To a mosque in Rotterdam want to come. The party wants his visa revoked and wants to withdraw any ANBI status of the organization. Voor Nederland Today also serves a bill stating that the municipal duty expires to ensure the reception of asylum seekers.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland about evictions of students for the accommodation of asylum seekers Amsterdam. The party talks about a massive influx of asylum-seekers and a failing policy where students become victims of. Voor Nederland wants to delete the priority scheme for status holders and those with residence permits under the law.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents about discouraging asylum seekers to come to the Netherlands. The party wants to reduce the inflow of asylum seekers. There must be a discouragement which applicants get less and living expenses Voor Nederland the priority rules wants to take away with housing. They ask the Minister what the maximum number of asylum seekers is that the Netherlands can absorb.

*

Parliamentary questions from the MPs of Voor Nederland a European fraud investigation into a mosque complex in Amsterdam. They argue that European money is used for the construction of a mosque, While this is against the rules. The building is also doing subsidized as a Muslim prayer room and there are also a Turkish and Moroccan mosque. A later response shows that there is only given funding for the non-religious part of the building and there was no fraud.

*

motion Voor Nederland in which the party requests the Government to indicate what the maximum number of asylum seekers is that the Netherlands can. Voor Nederland states that the absorption capacity of the Netherlands is not infinite. The thousands of asylum seekers per week have major social and economic consequences, According to the party.

*

In the House must Voor Nederland three motions on the theme of Islamic terrorism. The party wants as quickly as possible administrative detention possible, that jihadists can be arrested and put, without trial. Then the party will withdraw from the Schengen agreement and introduce border controls. The third will Voor Nederland a proper analysis of Islamic terrorism, to fight the good. Therefore, the government should recognize that the jihad is an essential part of Islam.

*

Parliamentary questions from the MPs of Voor Nederland about a possible anti-Western and anti-Israeli Civics teacher. That teacher would have argued that behind the Islamist terror Israel ISIS would sit. He would argue that cities like Amsterdam, London, Paris and Berlin are enemies of Islam. Voor Nederland not find it suitable as a teacher.

*

In the House must Voor Nederland a motion the arrival of thousands of asylum seekers per week to Netherlands. The party argues that this huge social and economic effects and the Dutch absorption capacity is not infinite. why would Voor Nederland the Government indicates that the maximum number of asylum seekers is that the Netherlands could.

*

Parliamentary questions from the party Voor Nederland a Dutch soldier who defected to Islamic State. They ask whether the screening of military personnel will be increased. They ask whether other soldiers have joined Islamic terrorist organizations.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents a “antisemitic textbook in Dutch education”. The textbook would be that Israel could be established by Jewish bankers blackmailing the British in providing loans. There would also be excluded alone that Arab Israelis from military service and thus discriminated against. It would not make sense in accordance with Voor Nederland. The party believes that the book contains so many errors and antisemitic allegations, it does not belong in the Dutch education.

There is also this afternoon asylum debate in Parliament and it says Voor Nederland confidence in the Cabinet. The party argues that the Netherlands can not anymore the influx and that "exorbitant cost’ and integration problems will come.

*

The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland proposes parliamentary questions about applicants who commit fraud for amnesty. The party wants to take action against municipalities and found that fraudsters should lose their residence permit and Netherlands must leave.

*

The Party Voor Nederland allows the parliament parliamentary questions about an attack on an international train from Amsterdam. They ask if it again this is an Islamic terrorist attack and want more security. In addition, the party wants the Schengen Agreement, guarantees free travel within a number of European countries, terminate. so will Voor Nederland "The growing terror and asylum deal". The party wants to change to a much stricter Australian model as a solution to "the immense liars".

*

The Party Voor Nederland serves in parliament initiated note in the decline of the ANBI status in facilitating Islamic preachers of violence or terrorist organizations affiliated preachers. The party focuses on Islamic fundamentalism which has ended up by "massive immigration" in Netherlands. Voor Nederland argues that this is not an enrichment.

*

Questions in Parliament by the fraction of Voor Nederland the tensions between Christians and Muslims in refugee centers. It is about threats and intimidation by Muslim asylum seekers. The party sees the Islamic background as the reason of the conflict and denounce earlier 'politically correct’ answers from the Minister. Voor Nederland wants the procedures of asylum seekers who are guilty of threat, harassment and discrimination put stop.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents the unrest in Den Haag after the death of a detainee in police. The party rejects accusation of racism directed at the police Den Haag and rejects the riots after the death of the detainee. Voor Nederland writes: "Whereby vandals guilty of threat, arson, destruction, roof, antisemitism and even sacking”. The party wants to use a curfew and military police.

*

The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions proposes a study on anti-Semitism among Muslim youth. The party has an older report, which says that wherever the Muslim community is growing growing antisemitism. They cite findings suggesting that 58% Turkish Dutch Jews all the responsibility for Israeli politics. Voor Nederland antisemitism qualifies as a consequence of “a clash of civilizations”.

*

The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland a motion is in the text: “Whereas the large flow of asylum disruptive acts and by the infiltration of terrorists I.S. also poses a threat to security in Europe. Calls on the Government, to commit to military deployment around the Libyan coast, in which applicants are not collected but are stopped and returned”.

*

At the request of the PVV , the council Almere This evening convened for an emergency debate on the introduction of a controversial Belgian-Moroccan imam at a mosque in Almere Outside this weekend. De PVV is a motion which called hate preachers to keep up the armed struggle calls. That motion is passed. The mayor is also concerned about another preacher who is speaking and that would be very anti-Semitic. However, there are no legal options to ban the meeting. The meeting continues and goes without incident. In proposes parliament Voor Nederland here today about parliamentary questions. They want to deprive the ANBI status of clubs when they invite extremists.

*

Around the theme “The situation in the Middle East” the supplying party Voor Nederland a motion which asked the Cabinet to set the subsidy cuts to organizations that anti-Semitism.

*

From 30 April to 2 Mei passes a controversial Muslim cleric in Saudi Arabia, a number of lectures in Eindhoven. In the City of Eindhoven have the VVD, of LPF and the CDA asked questions. They want to know what action the council will take to stop the arrival of Sheikh. Because of all the commotion, the lectures are canceled. presented in parliament the PVV en Voor Nederland questions about.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland the arrival of a “Islamic preacher violence” to Eindhoven op 30 april. They see the preacher as a threat to public order because of his violence calls and want to have rejected his visa. They want mosques closed calls for violence and organizations that tackle violence inviting speakers.

*

In a vote of Voor Nederland is the government asked for a guarantee that the language test when appointing new agents remains a decisive factor. The party claims that may not lower the level.

*

Voor Nederland asking questions in the House on an Islamic conference Utrecht. The MPs ask why the minister has taken no action against the arrival of "Islamic violence preachers”. They want the Minister “continuing arrival” these ministers to go to the Netherlands and what measures it will take against organizations inviting them. Voor Nederland will terminate any tax advantages of an organization.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions allows an investigation into anti-Semitic incidents in the world, stating that there is an increase of seventy percent. The study claimed that in places where Islam is growing, also increases the number of anti-Semitic incidents.

*

Parliamentary questions by the party Voor Nederland the mayor of Amersfoort which of the plurality of Foreign rebel fighters in the Syrian Civil War Amersfoort would conceal. Voor Nederland wants him to share this information with the public. In addition, the party wants a national approach which left the jihadists is forbidden ever to set foot on Dutch soil yet. The party wants to see established a public registry jihad, where all returned jihadists in his back.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents the arrival of a radical preacher at a mosque in Almere. The preacher would preach an incendiary anti-Western message which is also referred to jihad-related resources. The party wants mosques to be monitored.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions sets the news that an alleged anti-Semitic official need not be dismissed because of a ISIS-tweet in which she showcased a conspiracy theory. Voor Nederland finds this abject and wants the officer is dismissed as well because they can be a danger to state security.

*

Parliamentary questions from the party Voor Nederland about the alleged conflict of interest of two Labor councilors Gouda with a large mosque to be built. Voor Nederland pulls the integrity of the councilors questioned because of their ties to the mosque and Islamic positions with organizations.

*

This Sunday there is an Islamic charity event organized Utrecht. The last week will be the meeting in a bad light by articles in the Telegraph. The organization of the meeting, calling it a hate campaign in which suggestive words “jihadgala” en “hate preachers” being used. The party Voor Nederland such terms used in her questions in Parliament, they on 20 en 27 February asked about this meeting. Muslims today stabbing the dragon with the noise by hanging cynical lyrics (“Welcome to the mega-hate charity performances by preachers of hatred and hatred Moroccan comedian”). Under pressure from the party center fuss was considering canceling the meeting. There are strict security, because there are threats arrived.

*

As on 20 February, the parliamentary group of Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about "hate preachers’ or "extremist sheikhs', die op 1 March will speak Utrecht. The party believes that the entry of Saudi preachers violence contributes nothing to combating radicalization and extremism. Voor Nederland wants the meeting is canceled. The party wants the organizations that invite these figures to be addressed.

*

Parliamentary questions by the party Voor Nederland a meeting in Utrecht van “Islamic preachers violence”. The party wants no foreign force preacher gets more access to the Netherlands and will invite organizations to address them. On the 27th questioning the party again.

*

The news comes out that Muslims around a charity gala in Rijswijk have received several threatening letters, in which the anonymous authors turn against Islam. In a letter written by someone that something terrible is going to happen and that Muslims must book a one way direction Caliphate. Muslims denounce the attitude of the government seems to turn against Muslim initiatives. The government is indiscriminately visas Muslims and obstructs the building of new mosques. The charity gala would 8 maart 2015 zijn, but will be canceled and the organization feels limited in her basic freedoms. She experiences the fuss about the gala as “very restrictive and intolerant”. The noise is 6 February through GeenStijl started with a message about a “hate beards meetup in Rijswijk”. Then the Telegraaf devotes a series of articles with large heads against the arrival of “haatimams”. PVV-Staten Ed Braam, which is also a local council member is in Rijswijk, spoke the Telegraph from his fear of anti-Western speeches. Op 16 February calls VVD-parliamentarian Malik Azmani for a ban of the charity gala. On 19th, the Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about the “failing visa approach to extremist imams”. The party argues that failing to tackle jihadism and it's weird that several extremist imams only get a visa, which is then withdrawn. They want the organizer of the 'jihad gala’ lost her ANBI status.

*

The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland asks about attacks in Denmark on a synagogue and a debate with Islam critic. The party asked whether the Minister sees the threat of the growing Islamic extremism explicitly for Jews and Jewish institutions. Voor Nederland wants the Minister preventive maximum increases the security of all Jewish institutions. In addition, the party wants that Islam criticism better protection.

*

There parliamentary questions posed by parliamentarians Voor Nederland the arrival of a “Islamic preacher violence” Rijswijk on 8 maart. They want the Muslim be declared persona non grata and refused entry to the Netherlands. The party asked whether the Minister is prepared to close mosques where incitement to violence. Sometime around this date, the PVV ask about.

*

In the Parliament, both the party Voor Nederland als de PVV Parliamentary questions about the message that there is a separation wall would be built at a mosque complex in Gouda. The purpose of the wall would be to avoid visual contact between worshipers and women. Voor Nederland believes that this affects the equality and that Islam must adapt to Netherlands. Newcomers must adapt or should leave, the Party. They want the minister prevents the wall being built. Geert Wilders in the PVV call “apartheid based on Sharia” and to ban the building of mosques. They see the places of worship namely as breeding grounds of the jihadist ideology. In response later, the Chancellor that the situation could be different. A school for special education asked for a separation for the rest of her pupils.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland an article which says that in nearly two thirds of all immigrant detainees. They call Moroccans and Antilleans and want to know whether cultural factors play a major role in criminal behavior of immigrants. The party asked why only registered native prisoners.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions presents on “megamoskee in Gouda” who would like to keep a nursery because there are women. It turns out to be wrong. The party asking for the nuclear bunker that sits and the foreign financing of the mosque. One wants to prevent foreign funding of mosques with legislation.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland about the ongoing anti-gay violence Amsterdam. The party writes that in 2014 almost 200 violence registered against gay. They want the minister accepts that non-western immigrants, relatively more often accused of anti-gay violence Amsterdam. They point talking projects against the violence of gay men sometimes want the money this is going to be used for investigation and prosecution.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland about Islamic terror cells in Netherlands. The party wants the Minister acknowledges a link between jihad and Islam. The minister then names and photographs of returning jihadists to make publicly. They also want to have introduced administrative detention, so that returned jihadists are stopped at the boundary, instead of them to cope with.

*

The Party Voor Nederland submit a motion to allow administrative detention to hold on jihadists in order to prevent terrorist attacks. The party focuses on this motion returned jihadists who roam freely in Netherlands.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions states about the message “Belgium spreads radical Muslim prisoners”. The party advocates the spread of these prisoners in Netherlands, but also for “maximum isolation from these figures and, where possible removal from the Netherlands after serving the punishment”.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of the party Voor Nederland the reduction of the security of Jewish institutions include Amsterdam. They ask whether the Minister admits “the Jewish community of Islamic extremists is a specific target”.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland the message that the Netherlands is totally unprepared for a terrorist attack. The party plans major investments in the police, Defense and intelligence. wants Voor Nederland the deployment of the Royal Military Police for the security of train stations and shopping centers. They want to allow administrative detention and a public register jihad. Jihadists who have left the party should never be allowed in Netherlands.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents the cooperation between the police Den Haag and a Salafist mosque. The MPs ask why the police with the New Year weather cooperates with the mosque in law enforcement by citizens and to terminate this.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents a islamwet which is in the making in Austria. Voor Nederland suggests that the financing of Islamic institutions from abroad must be curbed, to counter terrorism and extremism. The party wants the Minister with the Austrian Government will agree on imams who receive salaries from foreign financiers. Who here would not be working more. Voor Nederland think a islamwet can provide in the Netherlands ensure that the influence of the Turkish state can be addressed.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland over “abuses in mosque-boarding”. They ask three Turkish mosque-boarding in Rotterdam still does not meet the national requirements. Voor Nederland asks other mosque-boarding satisfy the requirements in the Netherlands and that the Minister wants to close said boarding. Finally, they still want to know whether the existence of mosque-boarding does not run counter to integration.

*

A newspaper mentions parliamentary questions which Voor Nederland wants to ask about the winter shelter for immigrants without residence permit Amsterdam. They call it “administrative anarchy”. They argue that illegal is prohibited and it is therefore not appropriate for this people Amsterdam reward with free hot meals and lodging.

*

The Party Voor Nederland serves in Parliament a motion asking to revise the Association Agreement between the EU and Turkey. The party wants Turks are mandatory civic integration. Voor Nederland states that eighty percent of the Turkish-Dutch youth understands the use of violence against non-Muslims and it denounces the long arm of the Turkish state which reaches into Turkish mosques and organizations in Netherlands.

The party also proposes parliamentary questions on Turkish racism allegations against Netherlands. Voor Nederland believes that Turkey makes a fool of himself and the party lists a number of points which would show that Turks would perform poorly in Netherlands, would not integrate and would be criminal and anti-Semitic. The party wants the accession negotiations with Turkey for the EU to be stopped immediately.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents a demonstration in Amsterdam op 23 Last November. One wonders if there members of a Muslim organization were present and to designate the organization as an extremist organization.

*

Parliamentary questions by the parliamentarians Voor Nederland about violence in and around refugee camps. They want to know how much violence there in AZCs per year come. They want the minister acknowledges that ethnic and religious tensions lead to violence. They write that Christian asylum seekers intimidated by applicants with an Islamic background. The party sees enormous stresses by the constant influx of asylum seekers in the AZC themselves, but also in the Dutch society. They want shelter in their own region and a maximum number of persons who may be admitted to the Netherlands.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions sets on the British intention to denature left jihadists. It wants the Netherlands to follow suit and carries a strong anti-terror policy, which aims to exclude extremists and the structural safety of our country. Voor Nederland wants the minister jihadist ideology from schools, universities and prisons bans.

*

Parliamentary questions by the parliamentarians Voor Nederland a memorial in 16 November at the German military cemetery in Ysselsteyn The Ambassador of Germany. They ask the representative of the Dutch government this will be present. They ask if remembering SS'Ers leads to downplay the evil that was the anti-Semitic Nazi regime. Voor Nederland wants to prevent Dutch military and government officials a commemoration of SS"Attending ers.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions presents on “tremendous support of Turkish youth for jihad violence against non-Muslims”. The party wants the minister recognizes that there is a relationship between the Islamic background of the Turkish youth and their support for jihadist violence. The MPs argue that four out of five young Turkish people turning against our Western freedom and tolerance. they quote Pim Fortuyn which signaled a fifth column and want more money for security, to offer Islamic terror threat head.

*

A news website reports that Voor Nederland 'this week’ a memorial for Theo van Gogh held in the party office. This is a controversial Dutch artist invited to exhibit his controversial work on include Islam there. The artist also holds a speech on Islam, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Theo van Gogh en Pim Fortuyn. The small room packed with journalists and supporters.

*

The Party Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions allows the bending of the art world for Islamic radicals. The work of an artist could not be exhibited for fear of Muslim radicals.

Also the PVV asks questions about it and wants the work of the artist exhibited on a ministry. De PVV denounces the art world would be silent as Islam threatens an artist but demonstrates against Geert Wilders.

*

Parliamentary questions by the PVV a Moroccan man who Amsterdam were arrested for preparing an attack on officers. The party goes back to previous questions which PVV had requested the introduction of border controls. De PVV wants to know how the "illegal Moroccan" Netherlands has come in and wants to close the borders of the Netherlands for all immigration from Muslim countries. The MPs ask if the minister capitulates to the Islamist threat. They also want to use the army.

Ook Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about this represents “illegal Moroccans "who wanted to commit an attack in Amsterdam. The party wants a guarantee that the Moroccan necessarily be expelled and declared persona non grata. If he is guilty will Voor Nederland impose a sentence as heavy as possible. Also, we ask whether the “huge amount of illegal aliens in our country” are on the radar of the security in the context of counterterrorism.

*

Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions allows the abuse of anti-Black Peter protester in Utrecht op 15 oktober. The party rejects the abuse, because it is completely at odds with the idea of ​​freedom of expression. Voor Nederland signals a huge polarization arising “by the absurd discussion about the appearance of Zwarte Piet”. She wants action against violence.

*

Voor Nederland submit a bill to remove a number of discriminatory articles of the Penal Code. These are articles that prohibit insulting a group and incitement to hatred and discrimination. This is an older bill that PVV left are.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland the abuse of a boy in Zaandam. They ask whether the cowardly perpetrators have been arrested and that it mainly concerns people with a Turkish background. They want the Minister recognizes that growing tensions in multicultural society. From the subsequent response from the Minister that the suspect who has been arrested is not of Turkish origin.

*

The MPs Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions on a pool Amsterdam where Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch men separated from the other bathers can swim. They call it “subsidized Turkish Moroccan apartheid” and to withdraw that subsidy. according to a later response from the minister there to be no ethnic segregation, also indigenous men are welcome.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland about the “violent and anti-Semitic threats from a pro-ISIS student from Hengelo, zie 25 september. The party asks whether Muslim student has indicated supporter ISIS being and has threatened to behead Jews. Even if one has offended Jewish women and when now asking once steps are taken to combat the growing anti-Semitism among Muslim students. Voor Nederland To firm anti-terrorism legislation such as the introduction of administrative detention.

*

A newspaper mentions the beating of a Jewish man Arnhem. That was two weeks ago at night beaten up after a group of seven young people heard him speak Hebrew in his phone. His assailants shouted that they knew what language he spoke and shouted "Free Palestine". There are at 25 September parliamentary questions on this incident given by Voor Nederland. This they call the attackers “cowardly anti-Semites”.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland a new article “jihad attacks "in Belgium. The party wants to know what the current threat in the Netherlands and asked whether the Minister is prepared to enter into administrative detention in the fight against Islamic terrorism. The MPs ask why the minister refuses to allow recruiters lose the Dutch nationality.

*

Parliamentary questions by the MPs of Voor Nederland about sending away a policeman in Schilderswijk in Den Haag. They ask if the agent is dismissed for firm action, after Moroccan pressure including the ambassador. according to a later response from the Minister that this is not the case.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland a planned consultation about Zwarte Piet. The MPs call “this low point in terms of political correctness”. They do not want will yield to Netherlands “a small group of radicals has targeted a Dutch tradition”. They want the minister takes a stand “against the buck-baiting”.

*

The MPs Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions ask about "the growing number of families jihad '. They ask for details about specific families from different cities who have gone to Syria and Iraq. They want a guarantee that lapsed passports of all went out jihad, they lose their Dutch nationality (in the case of a dual nationality) and also ensure that they get a re-entry ban.

*

MPs from Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about the radicalization approach. They think that the Cabinet “Islamic radicalization, hate speech and incitement to violence” plan to prevent a conversation from a mayor with an imam. They want the minister acknowledges a link between jihadism and Islam. The MPs want the minister close mosques where incitement to violence, that imams who teach a jihadist message will be turned off and returned Foreign rebel fighters in the Syrian Civil War (optionally after a denaturalization) by definition put our border.

*

MPs from Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about a Muslim family in Lienden which is threatened with, for example, a ball-letter. They ask questions about the safety of the family, but also: "To what extent do you see growing multicultural tension in our society and what measures you intend to take to turn the tide?’.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland the fear of Jewish citizens in the Hague Schilderswijk. The party speaks of "the recent wave of Islamic anti-Semitism that draws on our country '. Voor Nederland wants to protect Jewish institutions and citizens and party argues that fails the government policy on combating the rise of Islamic anti-Semitism.

*

Parliamentary questions from Voor Nederland over “Dutch money for terrorist organizations”. The party wants everyone who transfer money to a terrorist organization also regard as a member of the terrorist organization and thus continue as such and penalties. The minister speaks in his later answer a “Action Program Integrated Approach Jihadism” and the deprivation of Dutch nationality.

*

The parliamentary group of Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions represents a “Islamic threat to Christian” a demonstration in Utrecht for the Palestinians 10 augustus. As a passerby was spat upon by protesters for a Nasrani symbol on service dress.

*

A Dutch-Moroccan official who works in the Ministry of Justice, post on Twitter: “ISIS has nothing to do with Islam… is preconceived plan of Zionists who deliberately want to blacken Islam“. She gets a lot of criticism and here PVV-leider Geert Wilders responds with a tweet: “disturbed, fire“. The MPs Voor Nederland to the Minister of Justice whether he takes action against the officer. She is suspended below, but also get a lot of support through social media. The officer also serves discrimination complaint in the College for Human Rights. She feels discriminated against her Muslim faith and Moroccan background because her employer responds firmly with a suspension and a conditional dismissal.

*

The MPs Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about a Jewish woman who is abused to an Israeli flag Amsterdam. They point to the danger of the rapidly growing Islamic legitimized anti-Semitism in the Netherlands.’

also states Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions about the involvement of "hundreds of Moroccan-Dutch youths in liquidation '. The party wants to introduce minimum penalties and criminal immigrants and criminals with dual nationality denature and deport in case of serious violent crimes.

*

There parliamentary questions posed by MPs Voor Nederland about the growth of anti-gay violence Amsterdam. They want the minister recognizes that non-western immigrants are relatively more often accused of violence than natives.

*

The MPs Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about the "systematic terror against Jews in the Netherlands'. They ask whether the Minister focused on "the fight against the growing Muslim antisemitism '. They ask whether the many anti-Israel demonstrations lead to orgies of hatred of Jews. They want to meet Jewish institutions and individuals in the security costs they incur.

*

Geert Wilders in the PVV-faction in parliament put parliamentary questions about the "anti-Semitic demonstration by Muslims Den Haag"on 24 juli. They ask why is not action against offenses in the demonstration as the violence calls and bringing the Hitler salute.

MPs also Voor Nederland are indignant about this demonstration. They ask whether the minister now see the connection between contemporary anti-Semitism and the growing influence of Islam. They ask why no one is arrested for bringing the Hitler salute, threatening journalists and calls to murder Jews. Both parties have criticized the mayor.

*

A newspaper today reported that the Moroccan-Dutch goalkeeper Sparta Rotterdam mingled on Twitter, in a discussion about Israel and the Palestinian Hamas. He calls it the Jewish advocacy CIDI a “criminal organization”. In an earlier tweet, he had been as a CIDI “pro-apartheidorganisatie” labeled. presents on the 17th Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions here about. They place the tweets in light of a growing anti-Semitism in the Netherlands. Voor Nederland has concerns that there are no massive condemnation sounds from the Islamic community of Islam-related killings, massacres and torture in Syria, Iraq, Somalia and Nigeria.

*

The fractions of the PVV en Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions on a demonstration in Den Haag op 12 July where protesters Israeli military actions in Gaza compared to Nazism. Voor Nederland sees the use of swastikas at this demonstration as an expression of the growing anti-Semitism. Geert Wilders asks the PVV whether the minister knows that swastikas were displayed, the Hitler salute was taken and "Islamic terror flags’ were shown. They want to be arrested the perpetrators thereof, be fixed put, be declared persona non grata and expelled forever Netherlands.

*

Parliamentary questions by Voor Nederland an antisemitic incitement to violence during a radical Islamist demonstration Den Haag op 4 last July. The party claims that refer to that demonstration is to Khaybar, a name for the historic event and where hundreds of Jews were massacred by the army of Muhammad.

*

In Den Haag Friday showcases a group of radical Muslims for the release of several Muslims imprisoned. They are demonstrating the Tawheed flag is also used by Islamic State. According to a member of parliament from Voor Nederland here is also called an anti-Semitic slogan which is scope: “Joden, herinner je Khaybar, Mohammed's army will return ". The MP sees this as a call for violence against Jews because Khaybar is a historic place and event in which hundreds of Jews were massacred by the army of Muhammad. Op 8 July sets Voor Nederland Parliamentary questions on this subject.

*

Voor Nederland proposes parliamentary questions about preschool extra language classes for immigrant children who would have no effect. The party asks how expensive they are and whether the parents can not themselves pay the cost.

*

An MP from Voor Nederland submit a motion to take Islam as a cause (triggerfactor) Semitism. The investigation Antisemitism Worldwide shows that most violent anti-Semitic incidents committed in Western Europe by individuals with an Islamic background, thus Voor Nederland.

*

MPs from Voor Nederland ask parliamentary questions about the relationship between the funding of jihad and organized crime. They want to know or have been traveling jihadists Police acquaintances. They say that every returning jihadi should be arrested and must be placed in administrative detention.

Publications

2 Results

Monitor Muslim Discrimination 3rd report

Online image of Muslims and Islam
Jaar:
2017
Taal:Aantal blz:
188
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

Results of research show repeatedly seen in many variations and tonalities that Islam and Muslims in the Netherlands but difficult to accept. This is partly reflected in the results of research into experiences of discrimination of Turkish-Dutch and Moroccan-Dutch youth and the results of research on the degree of acceptance of Muslims. Many young people of Turkish or Moroccan feel they belong to the Dutch society. They feel excluded and rejected. They are not seen as individuals, but as Turks, Moroccans or Muslims i.e.. as a different set of. They feel differently treated
many areas of daily life. They feel, distorted in the press. Many young men have to deal with ethnic profiling by police. They call the unfavorable climate towards ethnic minorities as the main reason why they still identify with their community of origin and their faith. giving Taken together, the results of the study in which this emerges a clear indication that a thread experiences of discrimination make in the lives of these young people. One such discrimination is Islamophobia. Islamophobia manifests itself in various fields and in many sectors of society, in downright violent practices and ordinary interpersonal communication.

Particulars: Hoofdstuk twee gaat over moslimdiscriminatie in de politiek. Er wordt een overzicht gegeven van extreemrechtse groepen die zich in de onderzoeksperiode actief inzetten om moslims te discrimineren.

the rule of law, a quick scan

The manifesto for the elections 2017 rechtsstatelijk?
Jaar:
2017
Taal:Aantal blz:
32
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

Netherlands is a democracy. Netherlands is a constitutional. The purpose of law is to protect citizens from abuse of power by the government. In a rule of law the government must, as citizens, obey the law. They can not just reduce or take away the rights and freedoms of citizens in the country, even if she is elected democratically. The police can not just enter someone's house or put someone in jail. In a democratic state, everyone has the right to express his opinion within the limits of the law. Something which in case of actual boundaries are exactly, only determines the independent and impartial tribunal. A political majority should never restrict minority rights without more.
At the parliamentary elections of 2017 do 28 parties with. Many of these parties have written in an election what their plans helpful2. It is important that voters can know what those plans mean for the constitutional foundation of our democracy. The rule of law is never obvious and strengthening it begins with awareness. To that end, this report must.

Particulars: PVV on page 26 en 27. For the Netherlands 29.