Door:
Pegida
Place:
Schiphol
Participants:
Between 40 en 50 people
Extra:
Small demonstration on the first day of the trial in the Wilders trial.
Organizations:
- 1 demonstraties
- 29 chronicle
Results
Demonstrations
Chronicle
This Wednesday arises big commotion on social media about a recruitment text from an employment agency for a holiday job as a baggage employee on Schiphol. They use lyrics like “Earn money by lifting luggage Schiphol? Don't you die then? No, is not too bad. You work 3 tot 7 hours in a day. Then chill out“. The text is in slang, but would have a racist undertone. The employment agency removes the text immediately. They use even more slang like shave, batra’s, patta’s en fissa's and readers think it's racist. The employment agency still says that it is not the intention to create the impression that they are mainly looking for Moroccan, Surinamese or Antillean Dutch with a poor command of the Dutch language.
A man from France has to enter Haarlem appear in court for committing group insult on Schiphol in november 2016. He is fined.
Op Schiphol a young man insults a Jewish man who is waiting with his parents with the cry: “kike“. If the Jewish man asks what he says hij, the young man repeats several times: “You are a cancer jew“. The Jewish man calls the customs and police, where the perpetrator is arrested.
Take it to court Schiphol (in Badhoevedorp) delivers judgment in the criminal case against Geert Wilders in the ‘less Moroccans‘ matter. The judges determine that the judgments of the PVV-foreman are punishable, but do not impose punishment. The sentence alone is enough punishment for the politician. Wilders incited discrimination, because he turned on a clear group of people, from the same region. From a legal point of view, there is then race. Wilders is acquitted of inciting hatred. The statements are a form of conscious group insult. The entire Moroccan population group in the Netherlands was dismissed as inferior. Wilders is not present at the verdict and he will appeal against the verdict. The political party Voor Nederland calls it a "black day for freedom of expression“. Outside, two protesters are present with a protest sign on which “In …. do you want more or less political processes?” staat. The Public Prosecution Service also appeals.
The Human Rights Institute examines the complaint of a man of Afghan nationality living in Great Britain. He was born in early February 2016 Refused on a flight from Schiphol to Great Britain because he did not want to show his visa and residence permit. He felt that he was the only one being checked and experienced the treatment as humiliating. At the time, the staff also did not answer questions about why the check happened. The College states that he was treated differently from EU nationals because of his nationality. This is an indirect distinction based on nationality. However, this is justified in this case from the laws of Great Britain and the Netherlands. According to the College, the refusal was therefore not discriminatory, even though this feeling has arisen in the man.
In the lawsuit against Geert Wilders in the "less-Moroccans case"on Schiphol (in Badhoevedorp) is the PVV-foreman once again present for a long time. He asks “on behalf of millions” for acquittal.
In the criminal case against Geert Wilders to "less MoroccansThe prosecution demands (ABOUT) a fine of five thousand euros against the PVV-leider. The case is closed Schiphol in Badhoevedorp held. Meanwhile, a number of MPs from the PVV in the conference room Den Haag a large banner with a photo of Geert Wilders with his mouth covered with a red cross. Geert Wilders states that the Public Prosecution Service has sided with terrorists and wants to silence him.
In the criminal case against PVV-leider Geert Wilders op Schiphol (Badhoevedorp) because of the “less MoroccansSeveral victims are speaking. On behalf of Wilders is professor Tom Zwart (he was also active for the think tank Forum voor Democratie) and states that the case should not have been conducted at all. He argues that “Moroccans” is a nationality and not a race. Geert Wilders is not present at the session.
In the "less MoroccansCriminal case against Geert Wilders of the PVV op Schiphol (in Badhoevedorp) will it be challenge request van Wilders against a particular judge by three independent judges.
A session day in the trial against Geert Wilders due to ‘less MoroccansAt a court Schiphol in Badhoevedorp. They serve one challenge request against a judge because he would be biased. Paul Cliteur will act as witness for the defense today. In the public gallery are some supporters of the PVV.
The court Den Haag determines that the criminal case against Geert Wilders of the PVV starts at the court on location Schiphol. This is about the “less Moroccans” statements on those on one PVV-meeting in Den Haag are done in maart 2014. Geert Wilders does not show up, he wants the people who brought him to court to pay the costs of the trial, especially the Moroccans. Outside are three protesters with a banner and Yvette Evers has a protest sign on which “Shoot de Messenger, again” staat.
Take it to court Schiphol today decides that the criminal case against Geert Wilders of the PVV can continue. This is one of the many sessions in the “Fewer Moroccans" matter. Wilders is not present at this decision. He does tweet immediately “Prosecuted for what millions of people think #political process #pleurop“. The case starts up 31 oktober.
A trial day in the criminal case against Geert Wilders due to "less MoroccansIn the court of Schiphol in Badhoevedorp. He is present with a number of executives from the PVV. Wilders remains behind his statements.
Second session day in the criminal proceedings against Geert Wilders of the PVV in the "fewer Moroccans case”. However, Wilders and his lawyer do not show up in court on Schiphol in Badhoevedorp. This may be a delay tactic to sabotage the proceedings to. The action group DSDA calls on everyone to come back in order here Geert Wilders support.
The Member of Parliament of the PVV Dion Graus, says the PVV after the attacks Brussel not people who are nationals of a Muslim country anymore wants as workers on the secure parts of Dutch airports. He argues that several former employees of the airport in Brussel his jihadists. Graus also points out that at Schiphol a Muslim prayer room located in the heart of the airport. He thinks that “this kind of dangerous situations at Dutch airports, where possible, is to be prevented“.
The Court Den Haag holds the first public pre-trial in criminal proceedings against PVV-foreman Geert Wilders in the high security court on Schiphol (to Badhoevedorp). He is on trial for insulting racial and inciting discrimination and hatred. Wilders showed his followers to call fewer Moroccans at an election meeting 19 maart 2014 in Den Haag. The matter is not substantively discussed today, but his supporters come here for endorsements. There are more than thirty Pegida demonstrators to support Wilders. A group of people DSDA was arrested by the military police for banned weapons in their car: Measuring, pepper spray and a life preserver. In the process itself Geert Wilders present and he stands by his statements. He says again that he wants to have fewer Moroccans in the Netherlands and we 'a Moroccan problem" to have.
A man of Nigerian origin at will Schiphol to board a flight to Milaan, but the gate has been closed for five minutes. Hence it is denied access to the aircraft. When he sees that white passengers on other flights, who are late, however be allowed on their flights, he feels discriminated. He needs a discrimination complaint for racial discrimination.
A man with the Afghan nationals living in Britain, is denied on a flight from Schiphol to Britain. He refuses to show his request visas and residence permits and are being denied. He says he was the only one that was closely supervised and felt humiliating treatment. He gets no response from the staff why this happens. He needs a discrimination complaint.
The Member of Parliament Dion Graus of the PVV is a motion stating that no people (second) passport would be allowed to operate an Islamic country as security guards in the security zone Schiphol. He initially even get enough support to why the motion anyway to submit to, and takes to MPs of the other parties. He suggests they share responsibility for a possible attack on Schiphol. If he still can submit the motion he gets a lot of criticism of his discriminatory remarks. Graus also wants the prayer of Muslim employees Schiphol Close.
The Board for the Human Rights sees no evidence of discrimination against a Pakistani man end of February 2013 op Schiphol extra was checked on its journey from Kiev to Canada. He feels discriminated against by a security company in Badhoevedorp and an aviation company from Amstelveen. There was doubt whether he looked at the photo on his passport, because he was seriously diminished.
The Board for the Protection of Human Rights jurisdiction in a case of a Pakistani-Dutch student from Amsterdam against an Israeli air carrier with a branch in Amstelveen. The student has a dark skin and was in January 2011 much heavier checked for Schiphol, then her white fellow travelers. The Board proposes that the airline made a distinction prohibitions against the student based on race. No distinction shall be determined on the basis of nationality, political opinion or religion.
De PVV Parliamentary questions represents about a woman who worked at State Police and received no "Declaration of No Objection" from the military intelligence. She worked in the security of the Royal Family, the Prime Minister and at Airport Schiphol. The reason for the refusal is not mentioned, but the PVV says that she converted to Islam and her partner shared the house with the sister of a 2008 convicted member of the Hofstad. De PVV asks how it is that this alleged risk is not noticed before.
Op Schiphol is a transit passenger traveling extra checks from Kiev to Toronto. The man is originally from Pakistani descent. He feels discriminated against and do about it complained to the Board for the Protection of Human Rights. The complaint focuses on aviation companies Amstelveen en Badhoevedorp.
The Board for the Protection of Human Rights jurisdiction in a matter of a Jewish boy in May 2012 was refused as Airport Security Guard at a training Amsterdam. He reported that he could walk no training because of his faith during the Sabbath, Jewish day of rest. For this he was rejected as a student. He would grant no training can walk at a security on Schiphol and a company from Schiedam. The Board today ruled that the school and the companies have banned discrimination on grounds of religion.
After years of court processes it does in Arnhem today ruled on the seizure of 82 daggers on 7 juni 2006 were imported from the USA on Schiphol. Het went om replica's van Dolken van het naziregime. On most daggers are swastikas, SS-signs and slogans from the Nazi era as “Arbeid Adelt” en SS-leuze “My honor heist loyalty”. Five daggers which only a Reich Eagle is already returned to the importer at an earlier stage. Today the Court determines that the remaining 77 daggers not go back to the man she introduced. Because there are discriminatory signs on the uncontrolled availability of the daggers in conflict with the law.
This weekend will be a Turkish singer, who would perform in the Netherlands, so long Schiphol questioned, that he no longer wants to enter the Netherlands and back to Istanboel flies. He would give a concert as part of 400 years of diplomatic relations between the Netherlands and Turkey. He feels shamefully treated. The Cabinet later states that the Marechaussee has treated the singer correctly.
A Jewish boy sign up for the training of airport security guard at a school in Amsterdam. He announces that he no training can walk on the Sabbath because of his religion. The school refused him this as a student because of two security companies Schiedam and from Schiphol him to offer no placement. He needs a discrimination complaint.