There are countless dreams, theories and strategies' which sets put how you could achieve political ideas. How do you end your ideal society should reach. Infiltrating other, politically more successful organizations is one of them. The extreme right has raised a long history. You need something as ambitious right-wing extremist…. Read more
With the expiration of the years you sometimes see people come to the surface in the far-right scene, where you do not really expect. Age plays in these cases it is often an important role. Many groups with an obstinate character (think of criminals) The age of participants is usually limited to between 15 in the 25. Ook… Read more
In september 2010 Venray's Committee against AZC founded. The action group is directed against the arrival of a refugee center in the town of Venray. Not everything is what it seems. The committee founders use a hidden agenda. They are much more extreme than they appear. The planned arrival of an asylum center (AZC) in… Read more
In this article we will look back on the past decade. The reason is that in our opinion, there is currently a transition period, perhaps even the end of an era. Some organizations are on the verge of disappearing, many far-right activists have recently been dropped. At the same time there is a party in… Read more
Combat 18 Nederland (C18 Netherlands) An unknown, small and shadowy organization that 1997 Founded. Following C18 England, where the origin of this organization is a changing group of Dutch attempts to propagate the ideas of the Nazi terror. One person is the thread, and changes the focus of C18…. Read more
In their own words Constant Kusters was 1989 active within the extreme right. Around this time, he celebrated so its twentieth anniversary. There are still some Dutch right-wing extremists who sustained two decades, but many are not there. While many right-wing extremists after a shorter or longer time drop off because the infighting, the gossip and internal… Read more
The Court of Appeal in Den Haag condemns a 22-year-old woman to community service and pay damages. She was in May 2008 member of the Nationaal Socialistische Aktie when the skinhead group Den Haag Night went a violent confrontation with police. The woman was in this confrontation and self-involved also used violence. She was in September 2010 here already condemned, but appealed. At the police found swastika flags and portraits Adolf Hitler at the NSA.
In Parijs the extreme right Comité du 9 Mai organizes their annual march in which all kinds of far-right groups in France and the rest of Europe to participate. Belgium from organizations like the Autonome Nationalisten Vlaanderen en Nation present. There is a Dutch-German delegation ACN/AKN present. There are people from the NSA in the VNNB.
A message on the website of the NSA today seems to suggest that they have lifted the club. It is the "last post".
Neonazi's van de N-SA from Belgium organize an emergency measure to Palestinians. It is a broader protest against the actions of the Israeli Army Orchestra Antwerpen, wherein the N-SA joins. At the hall protesting sure 150 people left- in migrantenorganisaties. De N-SA has brought its own banner and share with about ten people pamphlets. Inconspicuous would include representatives of the Dutch groups VNNB, ANS, NSA here have been present. According to a Jewish organization, there are also anti-Semitic slogans called, but it is unclear by whom than.
The Dutch National Action Group & Socialist Action (NSA) calls on its supporters to join today at one of the social marches held from the trade union FNV Amsterdam, Bergen op Zoom, Eindhoven, Groningen, Nijmegen en Schiedam. The call would be monitored on a limited scale by neo-Nazis. In Eindhoven they distribute folders of ACN/AKN.
In the German Frankfurt am Main leftist groups organized a three-day anti-capitalist protest. The neo-Nazi organization NSA from the Netherlands claims that she participated there too today.
In Parijs organizes the extreme right dome “Committee 9 May” a march to the death of an extreme-right activist 1994 commemorate. Several far-right organizations have joined in this initiative, including RVF. From Belgium, a delegation from the neo-Nazi Nation present. The Dutch splinter organizations NSA, ANS en VNNB under the flag of the ACN/AKN network to Parijs traveled with a handful of people. Among them is the former ANS-foreman Eite Homan.
While leftist groups in central Utrecht demonstrate against capitalism, introduce neo-Nazis in the Overvecht a suburb prikactie with the same theme. De NSA en VNNB/NNS hang under the name of the Antikapitalistisch Netwerk (ACN/AKN) a banner and distribute pamphlets. They had previously called to walk along the left-wing demonstration, but are not signaled. There are also anti-Semitic stickers pasted. In Den Haag share the same far-right activists pamphlets at a bank branch.
Activists of the Belgian Nieuw-Solidaristisch Alternatief (N-SA) organize Antwerpen a solidarity action with the Assad regime in Syria. Dutch neo-Nazis from the NSA en VNNB are provided with their own pamphlet. They see Assad allies, Hezbollah and Tehran against “Zionism” and against imperialism. There are several dozen participants, including people from the Middle East. There were flags of Palestine, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria.
organized in North Brabant NNS/VNNB a first Stammtisch meeting that she wants to organize monthly in one of the major cities in Brabant. A guest speaker of the National Socialist Action (NSA) talks about capitalism and the revolution. Visitors get the manifesto of the new international Antikapitalistisch Netwerk (ACN/AKN) to take home.
On appeal by the two men in court Den Haag partly cleared for violence around a NSA-squat in Monster op 11 oktober 2008. They were previously in January 2011 already condemned, but they went on appeal. There had been talk of storms according to the Court. They are released from all prosecution. The extreme right-wing squatters were 2008 besieged by angry villagers and used force to defend themselves against.
This research report focuses on risk and protection related to discriminatory incidents at mosques. From the book "Islamophobia and Discriminatie'1 already revealed that the broader picture of growing Islamophobia in the Netherlands merged with the incidence of violence and incidents at mosques. The number of registered cases showed a continuity of periods when it peaked, depending on the circumstances. This was the case after the attacks on the WTC in New York 11 september 2001 and after the murder of van Gogh in November 2004. In 2014 were asked first mosques themselves about their experiences in this gebied.2 Combined with data from other sources we Although this did not complete but a plausible picture of discriminatory aggression and violence against mosques in Netherlands. This picture is summarized as follows. Of the estimated 475 Mosques in the Netherlands over a third (39 %) to make in the past ten years, had with one or often more occurrences of discriminatory aggression and violence. Destruction, with discriminatory graffiti slogans, (attempts at) arson, threatening letters and hanging a pig's head are among the most common incidents. Some of these mosques made such incidents
at least annually or even more often,. 30% of the mosques has experienced no incidents of discriminatory aggression and violence. From 29% of the mosques is not known whether they have had these experiences.
This report contains three studies on the aforementioned questions, conducted by Dutch, Danish and British researchers. The three research groups selected each with its own accent. The Dutch report mainly focuses on the interactions between parents and children, Danish report focuses on the development of young people and the way it is influenced by people and organizations that try to win the young people for their ideology, while the British report situates the radicalization process in the context of the social and political context. The interviews make clear that there is no linear path of certain types of family or parenting practices radicalization. In some cases, only the interviewees indicate the family as the main source of radicalization and de-radicalization. Concerning the latter: own choice (‘agency’), imprisonment and trial, so as a main reason given. The fact that the family was mentioned by almost anyone as a direct cause of radicalization remains that many conversations were reports of various problems that occurred in family atmosphere. In about two-thirds of the families was talk of separation, an absent father, lack of emotional support, psychiatric problems, sickness or death; in some families, there was violence and abuse. We conclude that such circumstances do not explain the radicalization process itself, but it can be a fertile ground for. The anger, for example, young people feel about the role their (absentee) father in the upbringing played -or just did not play- can make them more susceptible to recruitment by extremist organizations. But it seems that there are always other factors must be at play, like the feeling of humiliation or disappointment in the institutions of society. Although each of the stories is unique recorded in this project, precisely in the complex interplay of factors and conditions, signs are quite a few routes to and from radicalization that contain common elements. In this report, these routes are ideally typical journey's' named, a series of transitions that young people go through in their development from childhood to adulthood that usually a lot of navigational assistance required. The journey should not be seen as fixed patterns which fit any young radical by definition, but as an attempt to organization of the complex reality differently is put together for each young.
The Anne Frank Foundation manages the Anne Frank house and brings her life story to the attention to reflect on the dangers of anti-Semitism, racisme en discriminatie en het belang van vrijheid, equal rights and democracy. The Foundation does not give in, inter alia aim to provide information and educational activities about discrimination and human rights, ter bevordering van het goed functioneren van een open, pluriforme, democratische samenleving.
Deze rapportage geeft een cijfermatig beeld van de mate waarin antisemitisme, racisme en extreemrechts geweld in het jaar 2012 occurred in Netherlands. Daarnaast worden de trends op deze thema’s tussen 2010 en 2012 weergegeven. The report is intended, inter alia as a basis for the educational activities of the Anne Frank House. Furthermore, it also serves as periodic reporting to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OVSE) en de Europese Unie (EU).
In de periode 2004 – 2010 the Anne Frank House gave in collaboration with Leiden University's annual Racism & Extremisme uit. Over 2010 en 2011 is door het Verwey-Jonker Instituut, commissioned by the Anne Frank Foundation, uses a different method of data collection and reporting of anti-Semitic and racist incidents and extreme right violence. This method means that the statistical picture in this report is based on data from the Dutch police (collected in the BVH, de Basis Voorziening Handhaving) en het Openbaar Ministerie (collected by the Scientific Research- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) in OMDATA). This method is largely a continuation of the method for reporting in 2010 en 2011. However, some changes applied substantive reasons. Deze lichten wij toe in paragraaf 1.1 en 2.1.
Lees verder in de rapportage
4.4 Right-wing extremism
The AIVD investigation into right-wing extremism has shown that the fragmentation, fragmentation and disagreement among Dutch right-wing extremists in 2012 has put further. There remains however a small number of right-wing extremists active, especially those participating in social activities without direct ideological goal.
The actions of the German authorities against several German right-wing extremist groups, zoals de camaraderie Aachen Country (STAY), have under Dutch law extremists hardly led to reactions. This is because many of them good friendly contacts with German comrades kept and took part in activities organized by the KAL.
Read more in the annual report
The subjects racism, wing extremist violence, anti-Semitism and discrimination are widely discussed topics in Netherlands. Not for nothing concerning equal treatment and equal Article 1 of our Constitution. This shows how important this issue for our society. A recurring question in the social and political discussions: how often is violating the prohibition of discrimination? This monitor this question quantitatively worked for years 2010 en 2011. The content is based on a new method of data collection by the police, Those comparisons with other data sources makes it possible.
This report was commissioned by the Anne Frank Foundation. Reading is how often the subjects in police records, with the number of reports, suspects and the nature of the incident. Also shown are regional differences in the Netherlands and you can read how matters are handled by the Public Prosecutor.
Lees verder in de rapportage
Op 22 juli 2011 Norwegian Islamophobic rechtsextremist1 founded massacred young social democrats on the island of Utoya in Oslo. There were dozens of dead and wounded. He also placed bombs at Norwegian government buildings which were also dead. The perpetrator acted out of ideological motives: he wanted to put an end to the Islamization of Norway and those he held responsible for this strike. His attack was political in character. He turned not only against a young multicultural generation and the future party framework among them, but also against the institutions of the Norwegian democracy, against the basic values of diversity and openheid.2 As far as the shooter did his deeds as loner. However, he is a member in his motives and opinions of a wider, especially virtual network dedicated to Islam / Muslims. This is evident from the sheet prepared by him and widespread manifesto with its numerous references. This is an Islamophobic ideology globally shared by many people and movements and spread, especially on new media. An important part of this (Virtual) movement not only points to the Islam / Muslims in the construction of an enemy image, but also keeps the social democracy responsible for the alleged Islamization of Europe. This ideology comes in different variants. There are extremist versions, extreme versions and moderate variants.
The investigation into the extreme
right-wing movement and right-wing
extremist movement in the Netherlands is
the longest running investigation by the
AIVD and its predecessors. In this publication
the AIVD presents the current state of
affairs in the Netherlands based on the
results of that investigation.
The AIVD investigation shows that the
threat of right-wing extremism and the
extreme right to the democratic legal order
in the Netherlands is minimal. The
movement is characterised by a small
following, mutual disagreement and
personal animosity, ideologically different
views and organisational fragmentation.
Nonetheless, the threat attributed to
right-wing extremism and the extreme right
is often much more significant. A gap exists
between the actual threat and the perceived
threat.
Read more in the publication
In the public discourse dominating the Netherlands after 1945, anti-Semitism and racism – two of the basic elements of (“classical”) right-wing extremism – have tended to be seen as uncharacteristic of Dutch society.1According to many experts, this is attributed to Dutch experiences in the Second World War, as the Netherlands saw the largest percentage of national Jewish populations in Europe killed, after Poland. A guilt complex related to Dutch behaviour during the War has led to what is often called “the basic consensus” on what is “bad” and “good” in Dutch society.
Until a few years ago, little was known about radicalization in the municipality
Rotterdam. In 2005 Joining the program starts or Get Left Behind; Rotterdam
action against radicalization (paying special attention has shifted
on Islamic radicalization). Simultaneously start a central information: Switching the Information Radicalization (ISPR)1. This information point will - in addition to the police
also information and intelligence on extremism and radicalization in the region gathers
- signs of radicalization and extremism together from municipal services,
parishes, affiliated with the government institutions and front line workers.
is extremely right for the municipalities within the Rotterdam-Rijnmond region not
a new phenomenon. The ISPR brings an annual report with a date
picture of the nature and extent of radicalization, including the extreme right.
This report deals with youths and young adults who have become involved in extreme right-wing movements and then got out again. It has been established on the basis of research in which taking one's own life stories of the individuals concerned a central place. The extreme right in the Netherlands has in recent decades been subject to major change. While the extreme right is largely manifested through political parties in the eighties and nineties, This political orientation was the last decade especially
reflected on the internet and also in a more diffuse way street activism.
Politicians present themselves to their statements about ethnic or religious
to account for minority groups to court? Or is this
accountability to take place solely in the public debate?
This question can also be raised for cartoonists,
columnists, or comedians. This is an important social
question: where does the boundary of free speech
and start of the ban on discrimination?
That limit is not static, but depending on time, place and circumstances.
In the Netherlands plays this clash of rights expressly
in the legal prosecution of PVV leader Geert Wilders. Begin
2010 is the persecution ordered by the Amsterdam Court. De
lawsuit is of great importance for the determination of the boundary between
two fundamental rights in the Netherlands, but does not determine everything. Likewise
factor is that Netherlands to international human rights treaties
has committed and must abide by the Charter of Fundamental Rights
of the European Union.
Related to this discussion is to find and identify the
border between victim and perpetrator in incidents in which racism or discrimination
plays a role. In everyday practice shows role reversal
easily to be able to take place. Muslims have been victims
of Islamophobic violence, but radical Muslims may also be offenders
terrorist offenses. Sometimes commit extreme right youth violence,
because they have been victims of earlier immigrant violence.
In the aforementioned example of Geert Wilders this goes double
role, in particular,. When accused of inciting hatred against Muslims include
he is also a victim of threats against his person a
take many years for 24-hour security necessary.
Read more in the monitor
Fortuyn's famous slogan "I say what I think" has not in recent years
only gained widespread imitation, but also led to fierce discussions
about the limits of freedom of expression. Begin 2006, during
global outcry over the Danish Mohammed cartoons', pleaded vvd-
MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali for "the right to beledigen'.1 A Danish
prints was an image of the Prophet Mohammed with a turban in
the shape of a bomb with lit fuse. This cartoon was shown 2008
a starring role in the film Wilders, Fitna, which already has also led to
heated discussions about the limits of freedom of expression. Now That
which borders have shifted and that more can be said than before
seems clear. A striking example is the uproar over the
police raid in May 2008 a Dutch cartoonist 'Gregory
Shot in the neck "which for years has been criticized Islam. The Arrest
the cartoonist, who was suspected of the prohibitions on discrimination
to have violated, aroused great public and political outrage.
Cartoons should be able to, as was widely argued, regardless of
their content. The question of where the limits of free expression than
it should be, remained in the background. However, in discussions
in recent years increasingly argued that the border should
be drawn at inciting violence.
But, as others say, without inciting violence large
harm be done, because the expanded freedoms of expression
influence on the occurrence of intolerance and discrimination. As argument
for this position are indications for a relatively high level
Islamophobia cited in Netherlands. From a survey showed
that more than half of the Dutch, non-Muslim school age
fourteen- to sixteen year olds are negative relative
of moslims.2 As one of the causes is negative image
genoemd: "Negative stereotypes of Muslims and negative clichés
of islam, negative messages from parents and best friend
about Muslims and Islam, and the belief that Muslims are a threat
types for security an important effect on the attitude '.
Read more in the monitor