On Wednesday 17 juli zijn in drie landen verschillende woningen, kantoren en gevangeniscellen van neonazi’s door de politie doorzocht. Zij worden verdacht van het vormen van een terroristisch netwerk dat als doel heeft het politieke systeem van de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland met geweld aan te vallen. Een van de verdachten is een jonge Nederlandse activist uit… Read more
The famous Groninger far-right activist Eite Homan is still active
Thirty neo-Nazis of various Dutch organizations gather to commemorate various events of the Nazi past. There are people from VNNB/NNS, NSN en B&H. They commemorate the Bierkellerputch of 1923 that Hitler and his henchmen made a first attempt to come to power. It also discusses the death of a SA-man in 1932 and a traffic accident in 1997 where three German neo-Nazis were killed, who had good contacts in the Netherlands. three speakers are scheduled at the meeting. There are also stalls with promotional material, literature and music present.
Today comes a report within few Nazi stickers that are pasted in the center of Maastricht. They may hang there for a while. It involves stickers VNNB en NNS.
In Den Haag Syrians hold a rally to support President Assad's regime. They are protesting against the popular uprising in Syria. Nazi group Vrije Nationalisten Noord-Brabant/Netwerk Nationale Socialisten commits itself to this action. Ruben Rosiers Flemish groups Solidariteit-Identiteit en Nieuw-Solidaristisch Alternatief is one of the speakers.
While leftist groups in central Utrecht demonstrate against capitalism, introduce neo-Nazis in the Overvecht a suburb prikactie with the same theme. De NSA en VNNB/NNS hang under the name of the Antikapitalistisch Netwerk (ACN/AKN) a banner and distribute pamphlets. They had previously called to walk along the left-wing demonstration, but are not signaled. There are also anti-Semitic stickers pasted. In Den Haag share the same far-right activists pamphlets at a bank branch.
organized in North Brabant NNS/VNNB a first Stammtisch meeting that she wants to organize monthly in one of the major cities in Brabant. A guest speaker of the National Socialist Action (NSA) talks about capitalism and the revolution. Visitors get the manifesto of the new international Antikapitalistisch Netwerk (ACN/AKN) to take home.
There are Nazi stickers spotted in Dordrecht en Alblasserdam. They hang there may be some time. They are derived from the Netwerk Nationale Socialisten/Vrije Nationalisten Noord-Brabant (NNS/VNNB), which also has supporters in the region.
Before you is the update of the 'fact sheet far right Dutch municipalities' dated March 2017, in which a current picture sketched by the extreme right-wing organizations active in the Netherlands. This fact sheet should provide insight into the extent, Geographically, meaning and involvement in violent incidents of various extreme right-wing organizations in Netherlands. The composition of the list of organizations and presented facts about these organizations gathered under the Project Monitor Racism, Anti-Semitism and extreme right violence in the Netherlands.
This report is a report on anti-Semitism, racism and right-wing extremist violence in the Netherlands in the year 2015, and developments with respect to previous years. The report has been made on behalf of Anne Frank. The Anne Frank Foundation manages the Anne Frank house and brings her life story to the attention to reflect on the dangers of anti-Semitism, racisme en discriminatie en het belang van vrijheid, equal rights and democracy. The foundation proposes to provide, inter alia, aim to provide information and educational activities about discrimination and human rights, ter bevordering van het goed functioneren van een open, pluriforme, democratische samenleving. A major goal of this report is to provide input for the educational activities of the Anne Frank House. Furthermore, it serves as periodic reporting to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OVSE) en de Europese Unie (EU).
This report shows that the number of racist and anti-Semitic incidents in 2014 increased compared 2013. The explanation for the sharp increase in the number of racist incidents is unclear. One possible explanation could be a hardening in the political and social climate after the local elections in March 2014. However, the large number of reports against Geert Wilders is not included in this report. The increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents may be explained by the intensification of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the summer of 2014. In those months were in the Netherlands more anti-Semitic incidents. Due to the small number of incidents, we can draw conclusions however here. Opposite the aforementioned increase is difficult to explain decrease in the number of racist and anti-Semitic abuse incidents. A possible explanation could be that the type of profanity used fashion sensitive, allowing some epithets with anti-Semitic or racist connotation in 2014 less were used.
Three other points are covered in this report. The first is that anti-Semitic violence and racist violence take place within a different dynamics. The main difference is the reason: in anti-Semitic violence were much more often anti-Semitic intentions than that racist intentions in racial violence gave rise. The second point is that, Despite the stable small size of right-wing extremist, We note with some caution that extreme right violence appears to be increasing slightly. The third point is that the Prosecution has indicated from 2015 commune-offenses discriminatory aspect to take in its registration. Because of this, we expect 2016 a strong improvement in the understanding of the settlement of discrimination incidents.
The Anne Frank Foundation manages the Anne Frank house and brings her life story to the attention to reflect on the dangers of anti-Semitism, racisme en discriminatie en het belang van vrijheid, equal rights and democracy. The Foundation does not give in, inter alia aim to provide information and educational activities about discrimination and human rights, ter bevordering van het goed functioneren van een open, pluriforme, democratische samenleving.
Deze rapportage geeft een cijfermatig beeld van de mate waarin antisemitisme, racisme en extreemrechts geweld in het jaar 2012 occurred in Netherlands. Daarnaast worden de trends op deze thema’s tussen 2010 en 2012 weergegeven. The report is intended, inter alia as a basis for the educational activities of the Anne Frank House. Furthermore, it also serves as periodic reporting to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OVSE) en de Europese Unie (EU).
In de periode 2004 – 2010 the Anne Frank House gave in collaboration with Leiden University's annual Racism & Extremisme uit. Over 2010 en 2011 is door het Verwey-Jonker Instituut, commissioned by the Anne Frank Foundation, uses a different method of data collection and reporting of anti-Semitic and racist incidents and extreme right violence. This method means that the statistical picture in this report is based on data from the Dutch police (collected in the BVH, de Basis Voorziening Handhaving) en het Openbaar Ministerie (collected by the Scientific Research- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) in OMDATA). This method is largely a continuation of the method for reporting in 2010 en 2011. However, some changes applied substantive reasons. Deze lichten wij toe in paragraaf 1.1 en 2.1.
Lees verder in de rapportage
The subjects racism, wing extremist violence, anti-Semitism and discrimination are widely discussed topics in Netherlands. Not for nothing concerning equal treatment and equal Article 1 of our Constitution. This shows how important this issue for our society. A recurring question in the social and political discussions: how often is violating the prohibition of discrimination? This monitor this question quantitatively worked for years 2010 en 2011. The content is based on a new method of data collection by the police, Those comparisons with other data sources makes it possible.
This report was commissioned by the Anne Frank Foundation. Reading is how often the subjects in police records, with the number of reports, suspects and the nature of the incident. Also shown are regional differences in the Netherlands and you can read how matters are handled by the Public Prosecutor.
Lees verder in de rapportage
Op 22 juli 2011 Norwegian Islamophobic rechtsextremist1 founded massacred young social democrats on the island of Utoya in Oslo. There were dozens of dead and wounded. He also placed bombs at Norwegian government buildings which were also dead. The perpetrator acted out of ideological motives: he wanted to put an end to the Islamization of Norway and those he held responsible for this strike. His attack was political in character. He turned not only against a young multicultural generation and the future party framework among them, but also against the institutions of the Norwegian democracy, against the basic values of diversity and openheid.2 As far as the shooter did his deeds as loner. However, he is a member in his motives and opinions of a wider, especially virtual network dedicated to Islam / Muslims. This is evident from the sheet prepared by him and widespread manifesto with its numerous references. This is an Islamophobic ideology globally shared by many people and movements and spread, especially on new media. An important part of this (Virtual) movement not only points to the Islam / Muslims in the construction of an enemy image, but also keeps the social democracy responsible for the alleged Islamization of Europe. This ideology comes in different variants. There are extremist versions, extreme versions and moderate variants.