From the attack on the Twin Towers to a secret pedophile network that is in control of the world: the internet is full of unproven, even debunked theories and stories. Conspiracy theorists try to make money off this. A successful career seems only for a few.
The court in Leeuwarden delivers judgment in the criminal case against Wim Dankbaar from Overveen for spreading defamation and deliberate insult in Dokkum in 2014 en 2015. The publicist has been writing about the case of the murdered Marianne Vaatstra for a long time Kollum and sticks to the specter that an asylum seeker should be the perpetrator, while a Frisian farmer has long been convicted as a perpetrator. He misused mother Vaatstra's diary to make his point. He is to be sentenced to two months 'imprisonment and must also be sentenced to four weeks' imprisonment on the sentence of 3 maart 2014 sit out. Wim Dankbaar appeals itself and that should be done at the end of November 2017.
The Court Amsterdam provides that the entire edition of the book "The Forbidden Diary of Maaike Vaatstra’ van Wim Dankbaar from Overveen en Hans Mauritz from Dongen must be destroyed. They use excerpts from the diary of the mother of Marianne Vaatstra to show that justice has caught the wrong culprit. They remain stubbornly adhere to the theory that an applicant should be the perpetrator rather than a Dutch white farmer. To underpin this abusive mother of Marianne's diary. must be destroyed under penalty of a fine all books with diary.
A publicist from Overveen gets four weeks suspended sentence the court Groningen. He must also 1500 euro compensation payment. The man slanders people around the murder of Marianne Vaatstra and states that an applicant is the real culprit. He needs the right to delete all Internet texts and allowed two years no contact with the victims search.
The Court Haarlem provides that two men Overveen en Dongen not allowed to quote from the diary of the mother of Marianne Vaatstra for their book. Despite the confession of a white Frisian farmer keep the two men argue that an applicant would be the real perpetrator of the murder. For this, they exploit excerpts from the diary of her mother. She demands that it stops and the judge gives her equal.