Articles

4 Results

Identitair Resistance organizes Nazi provocation on Remembrance Day

Op 4 May 2016 8 PM stands Netherlands two minutes of silence, commemorates the Shoah and the dead from World War II. In Leiden this commemoration was an especially witty character with an equally nasty and provocative contribution of the right-wing extremists of Identitair Resistance. Identitair Resistance had apparently been officially reported to the Leiden… Read more

Jeugdstorm Netherlands

Three years ago, in may 2005, led a small group of right-wing extremists for solid tumult in Zoetermeer. The municipality thought with a group to make innocent troubled to have, but was with her nose pressed hard on the facts. She showed a group of neo-Nazi skinheads to have within the limits, the Soetermeer Skinhead Front. In september… Read more

Youth Storm Netherlands fights themselves stand out

In late October organized the Nazi youth organization Youth Storm Netherlands (JSN, the successor Soetermeer Skinhead Front) a party in Rijswijk. The entrance fee was € 10,- which would be given to a pot for political prisoners. That's not great news. And the chances that this party could get a high-profile character with so JSN… Read more

Soetermeer Skinhead Front

One of the many communities that have been confronted in recent years with the phenomenon Lonsdale youth was Zoetermeer. However, the size, development and the role of city government thereby fell so out of tune that now there is a strong group of radicalized Nazi youth: the Soetermeer Skinhead Front (SSF). On the roots… Read more

Publications

3 Results

Incidents at mosques: risk and protection

Jaar:
2016
Taal:Aantal blz:
66
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

This research report focuses on risk and protection related to discriminatory incidents at mosques. From the book "Islamophobia and Discriminatie'1 already revealed that the broader picture of growing Islamophobia in the Netherlands merged with the incidence of violence and incidents at mosques. The number of registered cases showed a continuity of periods when it peaked, depending on the circumstances. This was the case after the attacks on the WTC in New York 11 september 2001 and after the murder of van Gogh in November 2004. In 2014 were asked first mosques themselves about their experiences in this gebied.2 Combined with data from other sources we Although this did not complete but a plausible picture of discriminatory aggression and violence against mosques in Netherlands. This picture is summarized as follows. Of the estimated 475 Mosques in the Netherlands over a third (39 %) to make in the past ten years, had with one or often more occurrences of discriminatory aggression and violence. Destruction, with discriminatory graffiti slogans, (attempts at) arson, threatening letters and hanging a pig's head are among the most common incidents. Some of these mosques made such incidents
at least annually or even more often,. 30% of the mosques has experienced no incidents of discriminatory aggression and violence. From 29% of the mosques is not known whether they have had these experiences.

Particulars: This research is part of the project monitor Islamophobia. Right-wing extremism on page 25 - 37

AFS Monitor Racisme & Extremism

Eighth report
ISBN:
978 90 8555 004 4
Jaar:
2008
Taal:Aantal blz:
306
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

Fortuyn's famous slogan "I say what I think" has not in recent years
only gained widespread imitation, but also led to fierce discussions
about the limits of freedom of expression. Begin 2006, during
global outcry over the Danish Mohammed cartoons', pleaded vvd-
MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali for "the right to beledigen'.1 A Danish
prints was an image of the Prophet Mohammed with a turban in
the shape of a bomb with lit fuse. This cartoon was shown 2008
a starring role in the film Wilders, Fitna, which already has also led to
heated discussions about the limits of freedom of expression. Now That
which borders have shifted and that more can be said than before
seems clear. A striking example is the uproar over the
police raid in May 2008 a Dutch cartoonist 'Gregory
Shot in the neck "which for years has been criticized Islam. The Arrest
the cartoonist, who was suspected of the prohibitions on discrimination
to have violated, aroused great public and political outrage.
Cartoons should be able to, as was widely argued, regardless of
their content. The question of where the limits of free expression than
it should be, remained in the background. However, in discussions
in recent years increasingly argued that the border should
be drawn at inciting violence.
But, as others say, without inciting violence large
harm be done, because the expanded freedoms of expression
influence on the occurrence of intolerance and discrimination. As argument
for this position are indications for a relatively high level
Islamophobia cited in Netherlands. From a survey showed
that more than half of the Dutch, non-Muslim school age
fourteen- to sixteen year olds are negative relative
of moslims.2 As one of the causes is negative image
genoemd: "Negative stereotypes of Muslims and negative clichés
of islam, negative messages from parents and best friend
about Muslims and Islam, and the belief that Muslims are a threat
types for security an important effect on the attitude '.

Read more in the monitor

AFS Monitor Racisme & Extremism

Seventh report
ISBN:
90-8667-960-9
Jaar:
2006
Taal:Aantal blz:
256
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

With the Racism & Extremism seeks various forms of racism, extremism and anti-Semitism - and reactions to these phenomena - to
monitor and issue periodic reports. First we will look at the phenomena: how do racism, extremism and anti-Semitism in the Dutch society. One could look at the expression, such as politically organized racism, and to the exclusion form, eg catering discrimination. Some symptoms are limited by their nature not to the Dutch territory, such as discrimination on the Internet. In such cases, the extra-territorial context is taken into account. Fixed pattern in the monitoring study is the attempt as much as possible to identify different kinds of victims and perpetrators. This exercise can relate to both natives and foreigners, including the latter let divide again in various minority groups. The response to racism, extremism and anti-Semitism can be different in nature, from educational to legal. Usually the nature of the response depending on the appearance of the discrimination, the category of victims and the background of the perpetrators. In addition, some forms of response to coexist or even synergistic. Regular monitoring of the phenomena, victims, the perpetrators and the response serves several purposes. In this way we try to contribute to the understanding of the fight against racism, extremism and anti-Semitism. Furthermore, accumulation of knowledge rather than the fixed system and the periodicity of the study. Finally, there is an image obtained by developments in the long run and makes suggestions based on past experience for future solutions.

Read more in the monitor