Who sows the wind shall reap the whirlwind It will only happen. After a crazed Noor has committed a heavy bombing and then shot dead dozens of young leftists, he turns your extreme right club, or you designate as his personal inspiration or sympathizer. The Muslim hatred of Dutch right-wing extremists inspired Anders Breivik? The Nationalist Organizations… Read more
Michel Hubert is al jaren een zeer actief lid van de Nederlandse fascisten-gemeenschap. Begin jaren negentig was hij actief in de CP’86 en vanaf 1996 in Voorpost en de daaraan gelieerde studentenbeweging. Hubert wordt binnen extreem-rechts gezien als intelligente jongen. Qua opleidingsniveau is dat ook zeker waar, but its political and organizational insights are so… Read more
Medio 1999 constateerden wij een opmerkelijke toename van activiteit van Voorpost in de regio Eindhoven. Deze opleving liep parallel aan het verhuizen van Michel Hubert vanaf zijn studentenflat in Zeist naar de regio waar hij opgroeide. There he founded a circle Kempenland and knew a small group of old and new comrades around… Read more
It Voorpost affiliated National Platform for Action Nationalist Students from Rotterdam (LANS) has recently launched a poster made against pedophilia. This poster is part of actions on Outpost 8 April wants to run against “the acceptance of pedophilia”. For the layout of the poster they used a poster of the Nazi National Alliance… Read more
The strategy Outpost follows in its attempt to become a serious force in the political field in the Netherlands highlights the past two years enough by us in this Newsletter, in de Alert! and on the Internet: broadening through intellectualization, ideology and contacts with like-minded. Since this spring seems… Read more
In november 1996, around the time of the schism within the vicissitudes CP'86, saw a new far-right organization view: The Dutch Student (NLSV(1)) before: The Dutch Student, see box at bottom of article. She posed as a 'regular’ student, but that is certainly not. The NLSV calls himself a conscious association for Dutch students… Read more
In the fifth reporting Monitoring racism and the extreme right are the years 2001 and - where possible - 2002 central. The attacks on the United States 11 september 2001 and the murder of Pim Fortuyn 6 May 2002 have had a significant impact on the overall picture of this reporting period. Both events have left deep marks on the interethnic relations in the Netherlands. These traces can be found in the fifth reporting. It is questions like: increases or decreases the number of racist violence in Netherlands? Which right-wing political parties have disappeared and which come in its place? The number of discrimination cases that reaches the public prosecutor or decreases? And what be provided there for business and to what extent that lead to convictions? The initiative for the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right is the mid-nineties taken by the Leiden University. The monitoring project is now jointly conducted by Leiden University and the Anne Frank. This report was made possible with support from the Management Integration and Coordination Minorities of the Ministry of Justice.
Read more in the monitor
Is there in our country evidence of increasing or decreasing racial violence? How is it with the tolerance in the Netherlands? Has the local policy against discrimination catering success or keep the number of complaints? To answer these questions it is important that research is conducted to periodically monitor the manifestations of racial discrimination and extreme right. This interest is mid-nineties recognized by the University of Leiden and there is the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right developed. Currently the project is implemented by the Leiden University in cooperation with the Anne Frank Foundation and with support from the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. Research Monitor is an internationally recognized tool for the detection of racism and discrimination, and developing policies against. In 1999 was in Vienna the European Monitoring Centre on Racism
Xenophobia and start. The Vienna Observatory seeks to follow developments in the European Union and analyzed using national monitoring centers. The project Monitoring racism and the extreme right is an important source for the supply of data to the European Monitoring Centre. In the European Directive 29 juni 2000 equal treatment of persons on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin is also included a monitor provision: after the conclusion of the national regulatory (physical appearance) 2003 shall, with effect from 2005 every five years report to be done on the effectiveness of those national measures.
Read more in the monitor
The map of the extreme right in the Netherlands compared to 1999 not much
change. The world of the far right is divided into political parties,
organizations and groups.
Parties are the Centre Democrats, de Nieuwe Nationale Partij (NNP) and
Nederlands Blok. The NNP is the most active and trying to "clean’ slogans
accretion to find. The NNP arose when after the schism within CP'86
extreme right threatened to fall apart.
For organizations Post and the National Platform for Action Nationalist
Students (LANS). In Outpost mainly ex-members of CP'86, as Marcel
Routes, Tim Mudde, Marc by Marc de Boer Hoogstra, active. CP'86 was in 1998
forbidden.
Neo-Nazi groups are the Action Front National Socialists (ANS), of
Fundamentalist Workers Party (FAP) and the Dutch People's Union (NVU,
National Offensive and the new offshoot: the Stormfront. The
National Offensive otherwise hardly exists. The most famous neo
in the Netherlands is still Constant Kusters.
Read more in the Annual Review
The Extreme Right has always been weak and fragmented in the Netherlands. It lacked an
ideological tradition as well as a solid social base. A landowning aristocracy no longer played
a significant role in Dutch politics in the nineteenth century – power had shifted to a patrician
bourgeoisie already in the Dutch Republic (1588-1795). Moreover, the Dutch did not have to
deal with a national question that could have given rise to a nationalist movement with
extremist tendencies. It is true, reactionary anti-democratic forces did emerge in the late
nineteenth century, but they were divided between Liberal, Catholic and Calvinist parties.
Only has survived until today, the Reformed State Party (Reformed Political Party ,
SGP). This party has come to accept democracy in practice, but not in theory. It would like to
replace universal suffrage by ‘organic suffrage’, I.E. give the right to vote only to (male)
heads of households.3 However, it is not a nationalist, racist or xenophobic party.4 Since 1925
it has occupied two or three seats in parliament.
How intolerant towards native Dutch immigrants? Almost
25 year assesses the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP) public opinion on
immigrants and publishes regularly about. In the late eighties, early
ninety we see a slight hardening of the climate of opinion, but according to the
SCP there are generally few changes. Just About 80% of the
population thinks that natives and immigrants should have equal treatment
have at distribution issues, such as housing and employment.
Just About 13% of the indigenous population rejects
immigrants. Just About 50% of the indigenous population is against immigration
opposed.
Regarding this last NIPO found in 1998 a different outcome:1 not
half, but three-quarters of the native Dutch against further
Immigration opposed. There is - according to the NIPO - a growing support for
immigration restrictions while confidence in integration and
adjustment of immigrants decreases. NIPO found this trend going on
Polls in the years 1993, 1995 en 1998.
Eind 1999 showed another NIPO survey, one third of the Dutch
opposes the granting of asylum to political or economic
vluchtelingen.2 thirds of the Dutch have supported policies
government for political refugees who fear for their own country
their lives to give asylum. About half of the respondents felt that
seekers give nuisance. Further thought about forty percent that asylum seekers
on average, are more criminal than Dutch.
Read more in the monitor
Extreme right was in the elections 1998 almost completely wiped out.
After the local extreme right shows yet 2 of the 88 seats
having maintained: 1 for the CD in Rotterdam Schiedam and 1 for the
Dutch Block in Utrecht. In the parliamentary elections of May lose
only representative of the extreme right, the Centre Democrats are three
seats. This does not mean that all known far-right organizations
overview of 1998 still exist and – some more than others – active
zijn, except CP'86 in November 1998 was banned.
Dr. J. Donselaar goes into its third monitoring report published this month
elaborate on the map of the extreme right in the Netherlands. Far-right
parties are the Centre Democrats, de Nieuwe Nationale Partij (NNP) and
Nederlands Blok, De CD nam in 1999 the European elections with
a combined list: CD / Conservative Democrats. Conservative
Democrats was an attempt by CD leader Janmaat to a new name
CD again to revive. The NNP is trying to "clean’ extreme right
slogans the extreme right framework to unite among themselves. The NNP
then arose after the schism within CP'86 extreme right threatened to set
to fall.
Read more in the Annual Review