Home » Zwart Front (1934-1941)

Zwart Front (1934-1941)

Fascist organization that was active from 1934 tot 1941

Filter

Articles

1 Results

Study, Opbouw en Strijd (SOS)

Training Institute that had its origins in the Arnhem circuit CP'86, but there is now completely torn. Currently SOS can be seen as the training organization Outpost Netherlands. The main force behind the SOS Marcel Rüter, but Tim Mudde contributes. Main activity is the promotion of far-right… Read more

In de media

1 Results

Fascist logo fully shared in Facebook groups proponents Zwarte Piet

'Radical- and the extreme right playing for years on sentiment of angry citizens'.

A logo of the fascist organization Black Front is fully shared in Facebook groups of Zwarte Piet supporters. In these groups is fear of loss of identity and culture. Right-wing extremist groups then lifts it, According to research by Pointer. Proponents of Zwarte Piet share the image without always knowing what their origin.

Chronicle

1 Results
*

Zwart Front reports on social media that they today Oisterwijk went to the cemetery where Arnold Meijer was buried. Arnold Meijer was before World War II, the leader of an eponymous Zwart Front (1934-1941). His grave was recently cleared by the church. The Zwart Front has never celebrated before him here, but this will now be doing each year. On a photo is a flag Zwart Front on the ground with white roses and a picture of Arnold Meijer. The memorial would only be carried out by two people, including the foreman Ritchie Kolvers.

Publications

1 Results

AFS Monitor Racisme & Extremism

Eighth report
ISBN:
978 90 8555 004 4
Jaar:
2008
Taal:Aantal blz:
306
Soort Uitgave:
Beschrijving:

Fortuyn's famous slogan "I say what I think" has not in recent years
only gained widespread imitation, but also led to fierce discussions
about the limits of freedom of expression. Begin 2006, during
global outcry over the Danish Mohammed cartoons', pleaded vvd-
MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali for "the right to beledigen'.1 A Danish
prints was an image of the Prophet Mohammed with a turban in
the shape of a bomb with lit fuse. This cartoon was shown 2008
a starring role in the film Wilders, Fitna, which already has also led to
heated discussions about the limits of freedom of expression. Now That
which borders have shifted and that more can be said than before
seems clear. A striking example is the uproar over the
police raid in May 2008 a Dutch cartoonist 'Gregory
Shot in the neck "which for years has been criticized Islam. The Arrest
the cartoonist, who was suspected of the prohibitions on discrimination
to have violated, aroused great public and political outrage.
Cartoons should be able to, as was widely argued, regardless of
their content. The question of where the limits of free expression than
it should be, remained in the background. However, in discussions
in recent years increasingly argued that the border should
be drawn at inciting violence.
But, as others say, without inciting violence large
harm be done, because the expanded freedoms of expression
influence on the occurrence of intolerance and discrimination. As argument
for this position are indications for a relatively high level
Islamophobia cited in Netherlands. From a survey showed
that more than half of the Dutch, non-Muslim school age
fourteen- to sixteen year olds are negative relative
of moslims.2 As one of the causes is negative image
genoemd: "Negative stereotypes of Muslims and negative clichés
of islam, negative messages from parents and best friend
about Muslims and Islam, and the belief that Muslims are a threat
types for security an important effect on the attitude '.

Read more in the monitor