Vanaf medio jaren zeventig werd de villa van Florrie Rost van Tonningen-Heubel in Velp een plek waar oude en jonge nazi’s zich verzamelen in huiskamerbijeenkomsten. Hieruit kwam begin jaren tachtig Consortium De Levensboom voort. The organization was from 1981 active, maar kreeg pas in 1984 official status in the form of a foundation. This foundation mainly organized informal meetings and the distribution of Nazi propaganda. These activities ended after the death of Florrie Rost van Tonningen-Heubel, although the foundation officially still exists.
Landgraaf The Labour Party was shocked as well when the tip came in that she had a right-wing extremist gekandideerd. However, the lists in Landgraaf had already become final and deletion could therefore no longer be. Als With Jülicher (1955) real political color has changed, he had better open card to play on… Read more
Axes and De Wolden The new game Decisive Netherlands does in two counties along Drenthe. The founder Koos Visser (1959) Rolled out. After his son was beaten last year by Moroccan youth together, he started a facebook page “Dutch Offensive”, against violence. He acknowledged in the newspaper that the initiative nationalistic and even… Read more
Op 24 maart 2007 Sophie died Florentine Rost van Tonningen-Heubel at the age of 92. Rost van Tonningen gold inside and outside the extreme right circuit as a real old comrade. One that the Third Reich had experienced and never had any concession to its national socialist ideology. But what is its significance now been exactly the extreme right… Read more
From mid-seventies, the villa of the widow Florentine Rost van Tonningen Velp a place where old and young Nazis gather in living-room. It comes early eighties Consortium The Tree of Life continues. The organization is from 1981 active, but only gets in 1984 an official status in the form of a… Read more
Free (Friedrich Eduard Matthee) Verbrugge (1945) from Hoeven is from 1976 actively Outpost and fits 1978 Outpost- Netherlands on. He is one time chairman of this section, but leaves according to the Chamber of Commerce in March 1982 as a board member. In practice, however, he was to 1996 Chairman of the Dutch branch and… Read more
Tibor Rudolf Mudde was on 23 februari 1965 born in Amsterdam. He has long been one of the most important figures within the extreme right in the Netherlands. As a teenager, he becomes involved in the extreme right circuit and he is a member of the Dutch People's Union. In 1985 he is on the mailing list of the Consortium of the Tree of Life… Read more
Since the second half of the nineties, the Internet develops at a rapid pace. For anyone who wants it is possible to be connected to the world wide web. Rapid technological advances since its inception in 1997 also affect (been) on the work of the Internet Discrimination Hotline (MDI). In the early years the MDI received only a few reports, recent years that number was well above the thousand. From these reports over the years, a number of trends observed. One is a rapid increase in the number of reports of discrimination on interactive Internet, such as discussion forums
and interactive blogs. A second trend is the high number of criminal Without prejudice expressions on extreme right websites. This finding is supported by a recent report by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance of the Council of Europe (ECRI), which shows that in the Netherlands the main growth of right-wing extremism, especially among young people, place in non-political movements that informal, primarily through digital means of communication, organized. These data have to do MDI prompted research into the extent and nature of the extreme right on the Dutch part of the Internet, with a focus on the discriminatory content on these websites.
Read more in the publication
Fortuyn's famous slogan "I say what I think" has not in recent years
only gained widespread imitation, but also led to fierce discussions
about the limits of freedom of expression. Begin 2006, during
global outcry over the Danish Mohammed cartoons', pleaded vvd-
MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali for "the right to beledigen'.1 A Danish
prints was an image of the Prophet Mohammed with a turban in
the shape of a bomb with lit fuse. This cartoon was shown 2008
a starring role in the film Wilders, Fitna, which already has also led to
heated discussions about the limits of freedom of expression. Now That
which borders have shifted and that more can be said than before
seems clear. A striking example is the uproar over the
police raid in May 2008 a Dutch cartoonist 'Gregory
Shot in the neck "which for years has been criticized Islam. The Arrest
the cartoonist, who was suspected of the prohibitions on discrimination
to have violated, aroused great public and political outrage.
Cartoons should be able to, as was widely argued, regardless of
their content. The question of where the limits of free expression than
it should be, remained in the background. However, in discussions
in recent years increasingly argued that the border should
be drawn at inciting violence.
But, as others say, without inciting violence large
harm be done, because the expanded freedoms of expression
influence on the occurrence of intolerance and discrimination. As argument
for this position are indications for a relatively high level
Islamophobia cited in Netherlands. From a survey showed
that more than half of the Dutch, non-Muslim school age
fourteen- to sixteen year olds are negative relative
of moslims.2 As one of the causes is negative image
genoemd: "Negative stereotypes of Muslims and negative clichés
of islam, negative messages from parents and best friend
about Muslims and Islam, and the belief that Muslims are a threat
types for security an important effect on the attitude '.
Read more in the monitor
The Monitoring racism and the extreme right seeks various forms of racism, extreme right and discrimination - as well as response to these phenomena - to monitor and issue periodic reports. The initiative for this project is mid-nineties adopted by the Leiden University.
Since the fourth report, the monitoring project is run jointly by Leiden University and the Anne Frank Foundation. The usefulness of periodic monitoring report is diverse. It is based on a fixed yardstick 'the balance of the principal manifestations and incidents of racial discrimination, racism and right-wing extremism, and the development of strategies to combat. The reports are politicians, directors and representatives of civil society put in a position to reflect on the problems and come to solving strategies. The reports can contribute by their systematic and periodic character of accumulation of knowledge and understanding. It will also provide insight into developments that occur in the longer term. That applies not only to the recent period but also for the future. The monitor can also contribute to early identification of relevant, new developments. Finally, the report could be helpful in answering the numerous practical questions on this subject from
within- or abroad are made.
Read more in the monitor
In the fifth reporting Monitoring racism and the extreme right are the years 2001 and - where possible - 2002 central. The attacks on the United States 11 september 2001 and the murder of Pim Fortuyn 6 May 2002 have had a significant impact on the overall picture of this reporting period. Both events have left deep marks on the interethnic relations in the Netherlands. These traces can be found in the fifth reporting. It is questions like: increases or decreases the number of racist violence in Netherlands? Which right-wing political parties have disappeared and which come in its place? The number of discrimination cases that reaches the public prosecutor or decreases? And what be provided there for business and to what extent that lead to convictions? The initiative for the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right is the mid-nineties taken by the Leiden University. The monitoring project is now jointly conducted by Leiden University and the Anne Frank. This report was made possible with support from the Management Integration and Coordination Minorities of the Ministry of Justice.
Read more in the monitor
Is there in our country evidence of increasing or decreasing racial violence? How is it with the tolerance in the Netherlands? Has the local policy against discrimination catering success or keep the number of complaints? To answer these questions it is important that research is conducted to periodically monitor the manifestations of racial discrimination and extreme right. This interest is mid-nineties recognized by the University of Leiden and there is the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right developed. Currently the project is implemented by the Leiden University in cooperation with the Anne Frank Foundation and with support from the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. Research Monitor is an internationally recognized tool for the detection of racism and discrimination, and developing policies against. In 1999 was in Vienna the European Monitoring Centre on Racism
Xenophobia and start. The Vienna Observatory seeks to follow developments in the European Union and analyzed using national monitoring centers. The project Monitoring racism and the extreme right is an important source for the supply of data to the European Monitoring Centre. In the European Directive 29 juni 2000 equal treatment of persons on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin is also included a monitor provision: after the conclusion of the national regulatory (physical appearance) 2003 shall, with effect from 2005 every five years report to be done on the effectiveness of those national measures.
Read more in the monitor
How intolerant towards native Dutch immigrants? Almost
25 year assesses the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP) public opinion on
immigrants and publishes regularly about. In the late eighties, early
ninety we see a slight hardening of the climate of opinion, but according to the
SCP there are generally few changes. Just About 80% of the
population thinks that natives and immigrants should have equal treatment
have at distribution issues, such as housing and employment.
Just About 13% of the indigenous population rejects
immigrants. Just About 50% of the indigenous population is against immigration
opposed.
Regarding this last NIPO found in 1998 a different outcome:1 not
half, but three-quarters of the native Dutch against further
Immigration opposed. There is - according to the NIPO - a growing support for
immigration restrictions while confidence in integration and
adjustment of immigrants decreases. NIPO found this trend going on
Polls in the years 1993, 1995 en 1998.
Eind 1999 showed another NIPO survey, one third of the Dutch
opposes the granting of asylum to political or economic
vluchtelingen.2 thirds of the Dutch have supported policies
government for political refugees who fear for their own country
their lives to give asylum. About half of the respondents felt that
seekers give nuisance. Further thought about forty percent that asylum seekers
on average, are more criminal than Dutch.
Read more in the monitor
This is the second report of the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right, that was commissioned by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. The monitoring project has two main objectives:
1. monitor racism and the extreme right: the observation of these phenomena in the Netherlands, as well as the government response to these phenomena; periodic reporting, in two ways:
(a) 'General report': a general reporting on the basis of a fixed pattern;
(b) a floor battle ': reporting to a special subject is exposed.
2. The periodicity of the project means that displays a general report in one year and the other a 'floor battle'. The first report of 1997 was a general, which involves a broad picture of the phenomena of racism and the extreme right in the Netherlands, as well as government responses. Also those of the coming year (1999) a general report will be. This present second report is devoted to a special’ subject matter: the relationship between the media and also racism and the extreme right.
Read more in the monitor
This is the first report of the project Monitoring racism and the extreme right that was commissioned by the Ministry of the Interior. Under 'racism’ are also understood: antisemitisme, rasvooroordeel, Xenophobia, xenophobia en rasdiscriminatie. The monitor works are not exclusively focused on racist, but also to combat these phenomena.
The project has two objectives:
1. Permanent monitoring of racism and anti-racism
2. periodic reporting on the key findings
The utility of periodic reporting has many. Annually took stock based on a fixed pattern of the main manifestations of racism and right-wing extremism, and the development of strategies to combat. The reports can contribute by their systematic and periodic character of accumulation of knowledge and insights. It provides insight into developments that occur in the longer term. This applies not only to the past period but also the future.
The monitor can contribute to early identification of relevant, new developments.
The overall research question is:
1. How are expressions of (racist) right-wing extremism (in Nederland) developed?
2. which patterns of response have been there?
Read more in the monitor
Or the extreme right will manifest itself in our armed forces is also an open question. However, one might conclude that all advance, as the armed forces eon reflection ought to be society, there are potential opportunities for growth within the organization for the right-wing extremism. Because of the latent danger that anti-democratic movements within them is imperative that the armed forces binnon attention devoted to possible manifestations of right-wing extremism / racism . Efforts will continue to provide some insight into a number of extreme right-wing groups in the Netherlands, their philosophy, their supporters and the potential danger they may pose to the armed forces. To conclude, efforts will be made to process the content in a number of conclusions and recommendations regarding the armed forces.
P 6
The JFN is a latent violent, by National Socialist refounded, randgroepjongeren group without fixed ideology or organization. It objects in particular to a multi-cultural Netherlands and Europe. Political opponents , Jews and foreigners are colored object of their actions. The group members have no problem with the military service. Often one sees that conscript JFN members are regarded by commanders as a model soldiers. They accept without protest the military hierarchy and are often highly motivated. This sometimes leads to interest in special units such as the Commando Corps and the Marine Corps. As a result, there is the danger that, within certain units armed forces, by JFN supporters initiated, Incidents overlooked or trivialized.
Met dank aan Stichting Argus en Buro Jansen & Janssen voor het openbaar maken van dit stuk
Right-wing extremism
In the Netherlands, several extreme right-wing or right-wing extremist groups active, which must be distinguished from the way they manifest themselves politically and to the basic principles that lie behind this policy.
The Consortium The Tree of Life
The function, which the Consortium has assumed is to act within the Dutch National Socialist political spectrum as a kind of Roman Curia. However, because of the divisions within the extreme Right Netherlands, the Consortium this function up to now can not deliver. The leading figures of the Viking Youth in early 1985 Viking Youth lifted to play the role of the youth organization of the Consortium.
However, the movement Youth Consortium has not got off the ground. Up to now
still appear monthly 400 copies of the blade “Manuscripts” The Consortium. Due to lack of money is the limited influence of Mrs. ROST
Tonningen still had further decline within the right-wing extremist political spectrum. Meanwhile, try some “jongeren” again the Viking Youth set up as an independent organization.
Read more in the quarterly report
Co made possible by Stichting Argus en Buro Jansen & Janssen
Right-wing extremism
The Centre Party
After the departure of Drs H. Janmaat from the Centre Party was found, that the situation within the party was characterized by inactivity. In de periode oktober-december 1984 has both the leadership and the members a reconsideration and inventory of the Centre Party of prospects occurred. It now pays attention to the new face of the party, because they want to get rid of tactical considerations of the single-issue image of immigrants- issues.
When the CP is currently under the training of the future framework and to
Internal structuurvorming- en uitbouw van de partij. By joining forces are also working in the elections for the Lower House 1986. The outcome of this one is optimistic, though there are also wrangling over the details of the
candidates.
Read more in the quarterly report
Co made possible by Stichting Argus en Buro Jansen & Janssen
Right-wing extremism
The Centre Party
Four years after its creation, the Centre Party seems especially considering the prosperous-looking election forecasts gradually to gain a foothold in the Dutch political system. That this growth is not without snags goes especially evident from the internal conflicts within the party. The assertion that the Centre Party to its own division will go down at this stage, however, is too far-reaching assertion; that the growth process as a result of the lack of the necessary homogeneity will be hampered, however, is almost fixed.
Read more in the quarterly report
Co made possible by Stichting Argus en Buro Jansen & Janssen