The broken promises of Geert Wilders

In 2010 PVV showed two faces. spoke in pre-election Geert Wilders harsh
language towards Muslims, but he also spoke warm words about the hard-working citizens. The PVV would
social party, that stands up for ordinary people and wants to fight against the dismantling of social security.
The PVV election articulated in an appealing manner the feelings of many
people in our country:
"The Freedom Party is committed to the defense of our welfare state. Our laboriously
accumulated welfare state is a source of pride. Only the PVV stands up for the preservation of the welfare state.
The Freedom Party is fighting hard to preserve the AOW 65 jaar. is for the PVV
enforcement of this old age the only break point in the formation of a cabinet. Besides That
The PVV wants a strict remuneration policy for the (semi) public sector, State enterprises and financial
State institutions. For whom the Balkenende norm as maximum salary and the bonus culture
must verdwijnen.'1
People worried about their future. What about me if I lose my job? Who will
there for me when I get sick? Is my pension still confident? What Geert Wilders with his promise to the
made voters? What is it reflected in the agreement that he made with VVD and CDA? And what political
choices does the party really? We examine in this report.
We compared the election promises of the Freedom Party in the voting behavior of the party in the Second
Room. We are particularly looking at the motions by the PVV or not supported, from the
time VVD and CDA have become regeren.2 with parliamentary support of the PVV These motions are statements of
Room on their policies and ideally suited to test political promises to the political realities.